Spacecraft Spots Evidence That Groundwater Once Saturated Mars

The red dots represent the basins analyzed by the researchers.
The red dots represent the basins analyzed by the researchers.
Image: ESA

Scientists report finding evidence for an ancient planet-wide groundwater system on Mars, according to a new study. The clues appeared in images taken by Mars orbiters.


Studies continue to find evidence that Mars was once wet, from the chemical composition of its dirt to valleys seemingly cut by ancient rivers. But how much water and what effects the it had are still matters of discussion. The researchers behind the new study have discovered evidence of fluctuating groundwater levels in craters across the entire Red Planet.

“These deep basins (groundwater-fed lakes) will be of interest to future exploration missions as they might provide evidence of geological conditions suitable for life,” according to the paper published today in the Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets.

The Martian landscape.
The Martian landscape.
Photo: ESA

The researchers analyzed a sample of images of impact craters in Mars’ northern hemisphere taken by the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) and Context Camera (CTX) on NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) on the European Space Agency’s Mars Express orbiter. They identified 24 craters 1.4 to 3.1 kilometers (0.9 to 1.9 miles) deep, which they analyzed for evidence of groundwater’s influence.

Several lines of evidence appeared in the analysis. Some of the craters had valleys that appeared to be formed by erosion from water. Some had channels carved into their walls. Some had “terraces,” platforms that could have been formed by the presence of standing water. Fifteen of the craters had fan shapes that looked like river deltas. Some had cones that looked like branching tributaries. Their floors were flat, possibly from the settling of sediments from water. Sixteen of the craters had debris piles that looked like they were caused by landslides

Diagram showing the receding water forming features in present-day craters
Diagram showing the receding water forming features in present-day craters
Graphic: ESA

Taken together, these data points all occurring at similar depths made the researchers infer that the features they saw in these craters “contained water that progressively receded, leaving behind landforms in a specific chronological order,” according to the study. More importantly, the same features seen across the planet’s northern hemisphere suggested to the researchers that Mars could have been saturated with groundwater in order to produce the results seen in the paper. The water level also aligns with existing evidence of an ancient Martian ocean.

Results like these are exciting, and continue to paint 3.5-billion-year-old Mars as a wet place like present-day Earth, with oceans, rivers, and a water table. They also make you wonder, of course, whether the planet ever hosted life. It will take upcoming missions like the ExoMars Rover Rosalind Franklin and the Mars2020 rover to hunt directly for life’s clues—and this paper gives scientists a place to look.

Science Writer, Founder of Birdmodo

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Dense non aqueous phase liquid

This is great news for earthbound hydrogeologists. The only downside is travel expenses for fieldwork will be literally out of this world. So maybe not a job creator.

Trump’s admin is pretty much doing all it can to make America great again, i.e. when groundwater in many areas of the US had at least a foot of floating petroleum hydrocarbons on top of it.

Trump admin (including USDA, DoI, DoD and EPA) is doing everything in its power to gut established groundwater protection. EPA started (1970) with protections to air and surface water. Groundwater was an afterthought with latter day regulations such as RCRA, CERCLA (superfund) and LUST. This is when EPA added “land” to its media needing protection. The entire premise for Obama’s Waters of the United States (WOTUS) bill was to put protection first before development and curtail careless operations. At a minimum WOTUS would require baseline conditions determination to help compare good groundwater to bad groundwater. That’s why Trump’s EPA leaves out any mention of “land.” 

But this is just practice and not cutting edge basic science.