T-Mobile Will Stop Saying Its 5G Network Is Better Than It Actually Is

Illustration for article titled T-Mobile Will Stop Saying Its 5G Network Is Better Than It Actually Is
Photo: Drew Angerer (Getty Images)

The National Advertising Division (NAD), a division within BBB National Programs, told Verizon over the summer to cut it out with the misleading 5G ads, and now it’s telling T-Mobile to do the same. Add that to the fact that the Federal Communications Commission just fined T-Mobile $200 million for its abuse of Sprint’s Lifeline program for low-income consumers—the largest fine to be paid in commission history, according to the FCC—and T-Mobile is having a no good, very bad week indeed.

Advertisement

The NAD’s investigation of T-Mobile’s 5G claims, reported by Android Police, concluded yesterday. While the NAD found that some of the carrier’s post-Sprint merger claims had merit, like T-Mobile’s assertion that it will build the nation’s largest 5G network due to the merger, it asked the carrier to change the language of some of its other misleading claims.

Specifically, the NAD took issue with T-Mobile telling consumers they will get the best 5G network. NAD said that consumers could “reasonably interpret” these claims to mean T-Mobile currently provides the best 5G network and that T-Mobile customers will “imminently” have 5G coverage when that’s not currently the case.

Advertisement

“NAD determined that the challenged advertisements did not reasonably convey a present-tense message that the aspirational future benefits from T-Mobile are presently available to consumers,” the group said. “NAD recommended that the challenged advertising be modified to avoid conveying such messages.”

5G promises to change the way we use the internet, from the speed of our smartphones to the way self-driving cars interact with city infrastructure. But its rollout has been overhyped and under-delivers, with unreliable speeds at best and massive gaps in coverage. It’s going to take a long time to cover the entire U.S. in lightning fast millimeter-wave or even the slightly less fast mid-band spectrum that will eventually comprise the bulk of 5G networks. But that hasn’t stopped telecoms from airing problematic ads claiming their 5G networks are better than they actually are.

One day before the NAD announced its findings, the FCC announced it reached a $200 million settlement with T-Mobile over what the FCC said was “Sprint’s compliance with the Commission’s rules regarding waste, fraud, and abuse in the Lifeline program for low-income consumers.”

Low-income consumers participating in the Lifeline program receive up to $9.25 monthly toward either their phone bill or internet bill. The FCC discovered that prior to the T-Mobile/Sprint merger, Sprint claimed 885,000 monthly subsidies for Lifeline subscribers even though those subscribers were not actually using the service.

Advertisement

The FCC has a “non-usage” rule that says a provider can only claim a customer as a Lifeline customer if they use the service at least once in 30 days. Providers who participate in the Lifeline program received a government reimbursement for passing that $9.25 savings to their customers, but obviously they should not receive that money if they have customers who don’t actually use the Lifeline program.

Ironically, the “no-usage” rule is supposed to prevent providers from doing just that, but because that $9.25 a month often results in customers not having to pay anything at all, sometimes customers don’t see a need to cancel their service even if they don’t use it, according to the FCC. What happens then, according to past FCC investigations, is providers have oversold Lifeline subscriptions and pocketed the money from the government even though they weren’t actually providing the discount program to those customers.

Advertisement

In addition to paying a $200 million fine, T-Mobile will have to enter into a compliance program to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

And as for its 5G promises, well, we’ll believe it when we see it. T-Mobile has promised to scale back its claims.

Advertisement

Correction 11/9/20 11:36 am ET: A previous version of this article implied that the NAD is a division of the BBB. NAD is a division within BBB National Programs, but an independent non-profit organization that split from the BBB in June of 2019. It is not connected to the BBB. We regret the error.

Staff Reporter, Reviews at Gizmodo. Formerly PC Gamer, Maximum PC.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

I love how somehow the BBB acts like they are some sort of authority that anyone should remotely pay attention to. They are literally a company that collects a fee from any business that wants to pay them, so that business can put a plaque on their wall and a sticker on their window - there is no vetting process, anyone can get one. If the business rips off their customers bad enough, all they do is tell them to take the plaque down and the sticker off. That’s literally all they do, and they don’t even send people out to make sure the companies do it.

It’s nice to think that there are watchdog groups out there, but if Verizon or T-Mo didn’t want to do anything about this, they could just ignore them and hardly anyone would ever know, pretty much nobody would care, and the BBB would have no standing to do anything about it.