Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

The EU Could Force Companies to Sell Off Assets, Like Trump, But With Discussions and Meetings and Stuff

Illustration for article titled The EU Could Force Companies to Sell Off Assets, Like Trump, But With Discussions and Meetings and Stuff
Image: Kenzo Tribouillard (Getty Images)

In an astonishingly cool, levelheaded interview that rocked this U.S.-based tech blogger’s world, EU Commissioner Thierry Breton told the Financial Times that the EU is considering a number of regulations that could finally break up big tech and hold platforms accountable for disinformation. Sounds exactly like the conversations we’re having in the U.S.! Except in modest statements to the press and not tweetstorms, human trafficking bills, tarmac press conferences, and executive orders.

Advertisement

Breton told the Financial Times that the EU would like to adopt regulation that sounds like a more legitimate, straightforward path to accomplish what Trump is attempting with the ByteDance/TikTok “deal” (or shakedown, depending on your take). Only in dire cases, Breton says, the EU might resort to forcing tech monopolies to break up or sell their European assets altogether. It seems to be framed less about blah blah “national security”—a legitimate concern, but not the one meaningfully addressed by the proposed TikTok deal—and more consistent with the EU’s existing incremental antitrust regulation.

It’s unclear how that’ll be implemented, but Breton said that proposed legislation will be ready by the end of the year. Gizmodo has reached out to Breton for more details and will update the post if we hear back.

Advertisement

Breton also says European regulators are thinking about the longterm preservation of free speech. (Wild!) He wants to deal with illegal content and disinformation without dismantling the liability shield for online intermediaries ensured by the 2000 E-Commerce Directive. Shielding platforms from liability is incredibly important, and EU regulators understand this; “The safe harbor of the liability exemption will stay,” Breton told the Financial Times. “That’s something that’s accepted by everyone.” As a European Parliament report noted earlier this year, they might reform it by further clarifying mechanisms to remove already-forbidden illegal content.

U.S. lawmakers’ war over moderation, on the other hand, involves firebombing liability exemptions. Legislators on both sides of the aisle want to dismantle Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which prevents online platforms from being treated as publishers and therefore free from liability over user-submitted content hosted on their platforms. (Among other reasons, Republicans would like to modify it in order to grant them more power to troll, and Democrats would like to hold Republicans accountable for lying.)

The Financial Times also mentions “tougher sanctions” on companies that make it impossible to migrate data to other platforms (Facebook). Breton also floated the idea of a “rating system” that would show companies’ track record on moderating disinformation and paying taxes, for which EU and member countries have pursued Amazon, Google, and Apple.

What do they think when they look at us? Sometimes I wonder.

Advertisement

Staff reporter, Gizmodo. wkimball @ gizmodo

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Maybe it’s their size. Or having so many members forced to work in a second language.

But the EU actually seems to accomplish things. The US talks about the importance of privacy. The EU enacts legislation forcing the tech companies to support it. The US talks about accessibility online. The EU is at least two steps ahead of us in addressing this via regulations. The US walks back clean air goals. The EU tightens it’s goals, enacts stricter regs on diesels, and improves support for EV’s on the continent.

We could learn something from how they are doing things. Because as I look out my spare bedroom/office window, having just joked about nobody needing to worry about that fire induced health care issue as nobody will seek what they can’t afford, in an economy with millions of new unemployed and no safety net for them - we are doing something wrong.