Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

UN Panel Wants to Ban Li-On Battery Shipments in the Hold of Passenger Airplanes

Illustration for article titled UN Panel Wants to Ban Li-On Battery Shipments in the Hold of Passenger Airplanes

Li-on batteries can, in some circumstances, be really rather dangerous. A UN panel agrees: the agency has recommended banning rechargeable li-on battery shipments from the holds of passenger airplanes.


The Associated Press reports that the UN’s International Civilian Aviation Organisation (ICAO) is nervous about li-on batteries catching fire, which could ultimately lead to the destruction of an airplane. However, it also cedes that if new safety packaging were to be made that guarded against li-on batteries bursting open and into flames, it would be happy for the ban to be lifted.

The debate is not a new one. In fact, the ICAO stated just last year that shipping li-on batteries via passenger aircraft was an “unacceptable risk.” At the time the FAA agreed. The UN rejected the ICAO’s recommendations late last year, but the Associated Press report seems to suggest that the proposals remain up for debate.


The suggestions wouldn’t affect the shipment of li-on batteries via cargo airplanes or carry-on luggage, of course. Perhaps more striking would be a ban on bulk shipment of li-on batteries by air, period. As the AP points out, there have been a series of accidents aboard cargo aircraft—resulting in four deaths—that are believed to be attributable to li-0n battery fires.

As for the ICAO’s recommendations, they’ll be considered by its top-level council later this month. For now, the future shipment of li-on cells by air remains unclear.

[Associated Press via The Guardian via The Verge]

Image by tsuna72


Share This Story

Get our newsletter


I wonder how many Li-on batteries were on Air Malaysia Flight 370.