Both run Android. Both have lightning-fast processors (the Galaxy S a Hummingbird/Power VR, the Desire a Snapdragon/Adreno). Both can play Quake 2. But which handles better?
https://gizmodo.com/samsung-galaxy-s-smartphone-is-the-first-step-in-samsun-5500164
See the side-by-side comparison below. I won’t give too many clues away, but I’ve got to say that I’m pretty disappointed with the outcome. I’m like a proud parent who expected much greater things of her child—even if the initial tests suggested one day I’d be sobbing into my hanky, wishing I’d backed the other horse. Sorry, I’m so upset, I’m mixing up my metaphors.
https://gizmodo.com/android-phone-samsung-galaxy-s-has-3x-faster-gpu-than-s-5502737
Got a Motorola Droid? Then you’ll be wanting to see how it plays Quake III, right? Right. [Android Central Forums via Android Central]
https://gizmodo.com/quake-iii-runs-fragtastically-on-a-droid-5480029
UPDATE: More interested in Quake III? Check out the Galaxy S working its thang with some third-gen fragging. [AndroidCommunity]
