Skip to content
Commerce

Would You Pay Less for Backup Storage You Can’t Immediately Access?

By

Reading time 1 minute

Comments (0)

So Amazon Glacier is here as super cheap storage for “data that is infrequently accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are suitable.” But that’s different from a lot of the storage you might have used in the past.

https://gizmodo.com/amazon-glacier-locks-your-data-in-a-fortress-of-solitud-5936507

For your day-to-day life, would you want to take the discounted price Amazon’s offering to have backups it took a while to get to? What kind of data would you store there—maybe redundant backups?

Photo credit: ASSOCIATED PRESS / Ian James

Explore more on these topics

Share this story

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and interact with our community, get up to date with our customised Newsletters and much more.