Apple JUST Got Around to Banning 'Bonded Servitude' In Its Factories

Illustration for article titled Apple JUST Got Around to Banning 'Bonded Servitude' In Its Factories

Apple has banned 'bonded servitude,' which means it won't let its supplier factories make their new hires work for free to pay for the costs of hiring them. Good!!! And also: Why the hell is this just happening now?


When Apple gears up to make a new product, its supplier factories go on hiring sprees. To offset the cost of finding people to make the components of iPhones, factories have saddled their low-paid workers with the cost of how much it took to hire them, which often means hefty fees from third-party recruiters. This means that people who want to work in an Apple supplier factory often had to start their jobs in major debt. Apple had already been pressuring factories to recoup excessive fees, pressuring suppliers to pay back millions. But this is the first zero-tolerance ban on the practice.

Bloomberg reported this policy change, which went into effect in October but was just announced today as part of the company's annual supplier audit:

Apple's product cadence, which requires a quick buildup to meet demand once a new iPhone or iPad is introduced, requires a hiring spree. Suppliers often turn to third-party recruiters to find workers. These workers, frequently from countries foreign to where a factory is located, are charged fees in exchange for the job, sometimes more than one month's pay.

The workers who haven't worked enough to settle their debt often get their passports taken by the factories until they repay their debt, according to Jeff Williams, the Apple senior vice president of operations. Apple has been pushing its supplier factories to repay indentured workers for years, but this is taking it a step further and banning the practice altogether:

In October 2014, Apple informed our suppliers that, starting in 2015, no worker employed on an Apple line could be charged any recruitment fees. This reduces the allowable fees from one month's net wages to zero. And, as always, any supplier who uses bonded labor will have to repay all foreign contract workers in full for any fees paid.

Criticism about the conditions at Apple's factories and supplier factories has persisted for years, especially after reports that workers at its Foxconn factory had been pressured to sign pledges not to kill themselves because other workers kept killing themselves due to the awful living conditions. Problems with the way factory workers get treated haven't completely gone away: BBC investigation last December showed brutal conditions at an Apple parts manufacturer's factory in Indonesia.

Apple's most recent audit highlights how important it is for the company to make sure the people who work in the factories that make the parts that make it all its money are not horribly abused. "We will not stop until every person in our supply chain is treated with the respect and dignity they deserve," Williams wrote. Again, good! The harder it is to force people into the modern version of indentured servitude, the better.


Before we start patting Apple on the back, let's not. Expectations shouldn't be so low that we applaud when tech companies forbid abusive behavior. This should've been prohibited from the beginning. After all, Apple knew that at least eight of its supplier factories were using bonded labor back in 2013, two audit reports ago.

Apple isn't just cracking down on factory worker abuse. It's also attempting to eliminate "conflict materials," which are basically the blood diamonds of the tech supply world, the minerals that are either used to fund armed conflicts or mined by children or criminals. Again, very very good. But also very very overdue, and an example of why tech companies' supply chains need to be intensely scrutinized.


After all, this isn't just an issue with Apple. It is something that every tech company with overseas suppliers needs to stop. [Bloomberg]


In North America AKA USA and Canada this is often called Resettlement loans. You are legally obliged to repay the costs of your VISA legal Fee's travel ...etc.

Its not uncommon in the Large IT companies in NA to do such in bringing over cheap labor from overseas.

Or the TFW program of Canada, that legally allows a company to bring over a worker at 70% of going wages with a Labor Market review. Basically you tell the government you could not find a local Canadian to work at the Tim Horton's check out. So you need someone from India. Companies are responsible for travel to the country and home. And must help find housing. They are then tied to this employer or must leave the country.

Often these people find they are housed in company housing, and are provided loans on the travel which they must pay.

I applaud apple for getting rid of this. Now only if some of these Large NA based IT companies would do the same.