Boeing Brags About Size of Its Rocket, Says SpaceX's Is Too Small for NASA's Needs

Boeing’s Space Launch System. It’s big.
Boeing’s Space Launch System. It’s big.
Image: NASA/Evan-Amos/Ryan F. Mandelbaum (NASA/Wikimedia Commons)

SpaceX’s rocket just isn’t big enough to please NASA, Boeing says. Shouldn’t a big, important space agency be looking for a longer, more powerful rocket to fulfill its deep-space desires?


Ars Technica’s Eric Berger reports:

Recently, Boeing created a website called “Watch US Fly” to promote its aerospace industry—a grab bag of everything from Chinese tariffs to President Trump’s visit to the company’s facilities in St. Louis. Among the most intriguing sections is one that promotes the company’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and argues that SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy booster is “too small” for NASA’s deep exploration program.

Berger goes on to explain that NASA hasn’t yet built anything big enough to necessitate such a large rocket. Additionally, the Boeing SLS in its current form wouldn’t be the most powerful rocket ever, and would require billions of dollars and a decade to reach that milestone.

I’m sorry, Boeing, but it sounds like you’re trying to compensate for something. The same website offers five reasons that the SLS is the best rocket: “most powerful,” “world’s largest,” “flexible,” “American-made,” and “expertise.” If this isn’t an overconfident pitch for a sexual encounter, then I don’t know what is.

So, don’t pick Boeing because you need it, America, because you don’t. Pick it because it’s enormous.

[Ars Technica]


Former Gizmodo physics writer and founder of Birdmodo, now a science communicator specializing in quantum computing and birds


Also, by the time SLS actually flies, SpaceX will be onto the BFR, so what is this comparison actually showing?