Less time separates us from T-Rex than T-Rex from Stegosaurus

Illustration for article titled Less time separates us from T-Rex than T-Rex from Stegosaurus

Some of the most well-known dinosaurs that we think about today were separated by tens of millions of years. In fact, we're closer to the time of the T-Rex than T-Rex was to the time of the Stegosaurus. Unfortunately, that documentary The Land Before Time was totally lying to us.


We like to think of the Age of the Dinosaurs as this condensed period of time when every dinosaur was just wandering around the planet doing its dinosaur thing. But pre-history isn't like The Flintstones.

From Brian Switek at Smithsonian magazine:

Diplodocus, Apatosaurus, Allosaurus, Stegosaurus and their neighbors roamed western North America about 150 million years ago. This slice of time falls in the latter portion of the Jurassic. The traditional representatives of the latest Cretaceous scene—Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops—did not evolve until about 67 million years ago. By themselves, these dates are just labels, but think of them falling along evolution's timeline. About 83 million years separated Apatosaurus from Tyrannosaurus and Allosaurus from Triceratops. The so-called Age of Mammals—which began when the non-avian dinosaurs were wiped out—has been going on for about 66 million years. Less time separates us from Tyrannosaurus rex than separated T. rex from Stegosaurus.

Read more about the Age of the Dinosaurs at Smithsonian and check out Switek's book, My Beloved Brontosaurus on Amazon.

Image of T-Rex "Sue" at the Field Museum via Getty

Factually is Gizmodo's new blog of fun facts, interesting photos, and weird trivia. Join us on Twitter and Facebook.


Jim Adams

I've always questioned today's scientists with the accuracy of carbon dating. We can see drastic changes in almost any species today in just a few generations (look at humans for example- u can tell most Americans from European counterparts). It just seems that for the Dinosaurs, that's way too much time for very little change especially with the Earth changing it's own form so much. I'm not saying I agree with the "Dino's were here 5,000 years ago" bit BUT all I'm saying is that one day I would not surprised to see "BREAKING NEWS! SCIENCE HAS FOUND THE EXACT AGE OF EARTH IS ONLY 1 MILLION YEARS OLD".

Again, I'm just talking conceptually, not trying use exact facts and figures here.