Windows Phone 8 is lovely, and the Lumia 920 is supposed to be the Ultimate Windows Phone. Sadly, the handset we've been excited about for so long is just too fat to love.
Nokia's best possible Windows Phone, with a much-hyped PureView camera and a big, luxurious screen.
Anyone who has been praying, weeping, and hoping for a Windows Phone that's every bit as powerful and terrific as the iPhone 5 and top Android handsets. On paper, at least.
Gigantic. Glistening. Sturdy to the point that I'd worry about dropping it on something. Ferrari paint job. This is a phone tooled to make you go "Oh, look at that thing!," rather than just blending in to the sea of black brick rectangles—though it is essentially just an inflated Lumia 900, which itself was an inflated Lumia 800. There is a pattern here.
The 920 looks and feels like an Italian space mothership, with everything rounded, polished, weighty, and conspicuous. A lovely object. A 1957 Thunderbird. It's so, so smooth—I slept with it one night, and it felt great against my skin. It is a beautiful thing to look at.
Are you pretty much familiar with Windows Phone 8? No? Read this. Yes? Then you're pretty much familiar with the Lumia 920. Almost all WP handsets are smooth and responsive, and the 920 follows suit. In terms of interacting with the pixels on your screen, you'll be in warm, familiar waters. The software is as fine as you'll find it elsewhere, with the added perks of Nokia's mostly-stellar exclusive app suite. What few physical buttons there are along its sides—volume rocker, power, camera—are crisp and functional.
The software. Windows Phone 8 is the best version of an already graceful, beautiful, and outright daring phone OS. Those are words you don't get to use justly in reference to phone software. But it's true here. Add in Nokia's apps—the fantastic Maps, the best cinemagraph-maker I've ever used, the free streaming music—and you've got the best version of an already very good OS.
It's just too heavy.
The Lumia 920 weighs almost half a pound. It clocks in at just under than 90 grams less the iPad Mini. A tablet. It weighs more than the Galaxy Note II and the Titan. No, really. It's uncomfortable enough to be disqualified from serious consideration.
It's just too heavy. Inexcusably heavy. Way, way too heavy to recommend to anyone. The 920 isn't just big—the HTC Titan was big, and it was pretty great. The 920 is bloated, cumbersome. Anyone's first response will be "Ugh, God, this thing is heavy." It's a visceral, instant repulsion, and it doesn't get any less heavy, as if through some polycarbonate osmosis. It's just as galling every time you take it out of your pocket—stretched within a micron of its life—and that isn't the kind of feeling you want to have with an object you're going to be using all day every day.
Our gadgets should be comfortable. They should be made for our hands and fingers. The 920 was perhaps made for hands and fingers, but not of any mortal. Not any of us. Maybe Nokia figured that bigger means better means more things sold means Windows Phone 8 succeeds. Maybe Nokia just couldn't figure out a way to make it skinny. But we haven't just been spoiled by the impossibly slight iPhone 5—the 920 is a design failure all by itself. Everything good about it is nullified by its obesity.
The camera is very good—up there with some of the best you can find on a phone. But for all the hoopla and controversy we went through about the vaunted "PureView" capabilities of this thing, its lens isn't floating on a bed of springs and diamond lashes. It doesn't beat the hype.
In very low light (or even at night), it spanks the iPhone 5.
Far less noise.
In cloudy conditions, it's about on par with the iPhone, although the latter captures more detail.
But when snapping a well-lit shot on the move—you know, touristy stuff—the iPhone wins, beating the 920 even with all the hot talk about image stabilization.
The 920 has a very, very good camera. But PureView, like Nokia said itself, is just a word, not photographic magic. And in this phone, it sure as hell doesn't justify bulkiness and stupid overweight excess.
- Nokia built a terrific display—it's significantly larger than the iPhone 5's, but just as sharp (332 ppi on the Lumia versus 326 on the iPhone). It's highly readable even in bright sunlight—like Nokia claimed it would be—and both photos and video sing, popping on screen with fine color accuracy. You'll like reading and watching things on this screen.
- Wireless charging works, but isn't a big deal at all. I tested out a Fatboy charging pillow, which does indeed charge your 920 sans wires, but also is a big pillow instead of a wire. Not a very good tradeoff. More like a gimmick.
- This thing is slow to turn on. Like, half a minute boot slow. Bummer.
- Battery life is fantastic, even with both LTE and Wi-Fi enabled—more than enough to last you for an entire day.
- It can't be stated enough how annoyingly heavy and bloated the Lumia 920 is.
It kills me to say this, because I wanted to own this instead of an iPhone 5, but no. No you shouldn't. It's too big and heavy. It's not fun to own. It's not enjoyable to use. If you want a Windows Phone, check out the very good HTC 8X. But this? No, not this.
• Network: AT&T
• OS: Windows Phone 8
• CPU: 1.5-GHz quad-core Snapdragon S4 Pro processor
• Screen: 4.5-inch 1,280 x 768 IPS
• RAM: 1 GB
• Storage: 32 GB Internal
• Camera: 8MP Rear
• Battery: 2,000 mAh Li-Ion
• Price: TBA
• Giz Rank: 3.0 stars