Mossberg Reviews Vista SP1: "Don't Expect Much From It"

Illustration for article titled Mossberg Reviews Vista SP1: "Don't Expect Much From It"

Today, Mossberg takes a look at the lukewarmly anticipated Service Pack 1 for Windows Vista. It's an odd little beast of a review, its flat, monotonal surface covering a bed of barbs. (Most of 'em are true.) Here's the sharpest one (bold is mine):

SP1 doesn't resolve some of the most annoying flaws in Vista, including slow start-ups and reboots, and a security system that nags you too much and requires add-on anti-virus software. I guess these problems will either never be fixed fully or will have to wait for SP2.

Advertisement

That's a Stinger. Missile.

It not only basically calls Microsoft inept, each bit is an unspoken comparison to OS X. SP1 has, however, gotten better than its RC, which we tested a couple months ago. Whereas it took 30 percent longer to transfer files over the network than regular Vista in our test, Moss says transfers took half as long. Recovery time is better from sleep and hibernation, and rebooting is about the same, once it relearns your most frequent programs—a point I think Mossberg unnecessarily belabored, to my horror.

His overall verdict though is what I think is slightly weird: "On balance, the update is probably worth installing, especially since Microsoft will deliver it automatically. But I wouldn't rush to grab it and I wouldn't expect much from it."

It's fine to be disappointed (I was when I installed the RC1), and most of his criticisms are valid, even if you can see glimmers of 10.5.2 comparisons between the lines. But it's a service pack. A mild recommendation makes little sense (vs. a do-not-install warning, which could be perfectly warranted). You've pretty much gotta install it at some point. [All Things D]

DISCUSSION

newgalactic
newgalactic

@Kaiser-Machead: Kaiser, ususlly you're pretty sensable, but your obviously playing ignorant. Obviously Graham1010 is refering to the ipod touch, which does charge $20 dollars for feature upgrades, not the iPhone. And as far as UAC is concerned, I GUARANTEE OS X will have features/heartaches comparable to Vista's UAC when/if OS X reaches the market penetration and hardware install base of Windows. Don't get me wrong, I'm starting to appreciate OS X and the iPhone. I own two of the phones and am currently typing on a G4 with 10.5.2. But I do tire of the "it just works" rhetoric when that's not the case. I've never had a "Blue Screen of Death" on a Mac, but I've had my share of "Pinwheels of Death", and they are just as annoying (and kind of embarrassing considering the hardware set Apple has to test against). Also, I've never seen a Windows Mobile phone with crippled Bluetooth like the iPhone. No A2DP when all the necessary hardware is there? That's just lame. Let's try to be a little less like Washington and try to break from "party lines" once in a while. After all, why are you so interested in protecting Apples "reputation" anyhow. What have they ever done for you?