Texas Man Sentenced to 15 Years for Targeting Gay Men for Home Invasions Via Grindr

Photo: Getty Images
Photo: Getty Images

One of four accused criminals who posed as gay men on Grindr to set up home invasions was sentenced this week to 15 years on hate crime and other charges including kidnapping, carjacking, and use of firearms in the commission of a crime, the Tyler Morning Telegraph reported.


21-year-old Frisco, Texas man Nigel Garrett pleaded guilty and is the first to be sentenced from the group. Anthony Shelton, Chancler Encalade Jr., and Cameron Ocion Ajiduah are all awaiting sentencing after admitting their roles in the incident:

When Garrett and the other men entered the victim’s home, they tied the man up with tape, beat him up and made derogatory statements to the victim for being gay. The armed men also stole the victim’s property and his car during the home invasion.

The indictment also said the defendants posed as gay men on Grindr and conspired to assault the victims during four home invasions between Jan. 17, 2017 and Feb. 7 in Plano, Frisco and Aubrey. The indictment said the men committed the crimes because of the victims’ sexual orientation.

According to CNN, the remaining members of the group could face up to a $250,000 fine and life in prison.

The use of dating apps to target people for crime is nothing new—sexual assault is the primary concern, though online dating can potentially expose users to malicious parties of all kinds. The problem is, as Quartz noted earlier this year, while the risk may be relatively low and apps like Tinder and Grindr may be no more dangerous than other ways of dating, there’s virtually no statistics or research to quantify how safe it is. Research has also shown the apps in question are often not particularly secure and riddled with potential exploits that could reveal personal information.

As TechCrunch noted, an app like Grindr can be used to easily obtain the location and details of a potential victim, though they also leave behind trails of evidence. In this case, the trail of digital evidence left no doubt as to whether the attacks were hate crimes.

“The Department of Justice has made prosecution of violent crime a priority,” Acting U.S. Attorney Brit Featherston said in a statement, per the Telegraph. “The Eastern District of Texas, in prosecuting this case and others like it, intends to demonstrate that this priority is something more than just a slogan.”


[Tyler Morning Telegraph/TechCrunch]

"... An upperclassman who had been researching terrorist groups online." - Washington Post



What if they had used a dating app to target single women? Should they get any less of a sentence? What if they called them bad names while they were robbing them? Does that justify more charges?

Obviously, these are rhetorical questions. I think hate crime laws are silly and unneeded. The crimes committed deserve the fullest sentences possible. Calling someone bad names is the least of what they did.