The New Snowden Movie is the Best PR He'll Ever Get

AP Images
AP Images

Ben Wizner, lawyer for NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, was pleased when he saw the upcoming movie about his client eight months ago. “This is a dramatization,” Wizner told Gizmodo. “Having said that, it tells a true story.”

The upcoming movie Snowden will paint the man President Obama once called some “29-year-old hacker,” as a hero who exposed the great injustices and overreach of the global surveillance state. This will, as Wizner hopes, have a huge effect on how the public sees Snowden.

Right now, Snowden is in an odd state of legal purgatory. He’s been granted asylum by Russia until 2017, but has said that he wants to return to the United States. But Snowden and his legal team dispute the charges brought under a World War I era espionage act, which they say wouldn’t give him a fair trial.


Movies like Snowden (think Zero Dark Thirty and 13 Hours, or even The Social Network) play a significant role in shaping the public perception of how events happened, true or not. The Social Network helped lionize the story of Mark Zuckerberg as a methodical genius, and Zero Dark Thirty helped propagate the lie that torture was helpful in finding out where Bin Laden was holed up.

The public perception of Snowden has been shaped by people like Donald Trump who called Snowden a “traitor,” and said that he should be executed. Or by Bernie Sanders, who said that Snowden should pay a penalty for breaking the law, but still “played a very important role in educating the American people to the degree in which our civil liberties and constitutional rights are being undermined.” All told, Snowden has struggled to persuade the average American that he was actually acting in their best interest.

Oscar winning documentary CITIZENFOUR was a truly incredible movie, and showed the minute-by-minute of Snowden holed up in a Hong Kong hotel room with journalists, but it didn’t have the widespread theatrical release that the upcoming Snowden movie will have. For the first time, a huge amount of people will see Snowden’s decision to leak though his eyes. A movie that shows an intellectually gifted American patriot concerned about government surveillance and civil liberties may help to dissuade the people who think Snowden might have been some sleeper cell secret agent.

It may also help clear up common misconceptions about Snowden that work to sow distrust about his actions and motivations. He didn’t intentionally flee to Russia, as many of his critics have very publicly and loudly alleged. In reality, his passport was revoked while he was there during a layover. Setting the record straight on what actually happened to Snowden in the midst of the NSA leaks might help convince people that he was a legitimate whistleblower after all.


If that doesn’t work, seeing how easy it is for a low-level NSA analyst to enter some text into a computer program like XKEYSCORE and pull up huge amounts of personal data might show them that it was probably a good idea for Snowden to leak said documents. Here’s clip from the movie showing just that:

The true impact, of course, will play out over the next year, as people see and react to the movie. “My sense is that people who have been following this very closely are not likely to be materially swayed by the Hollywood movie,” Wizner said.


Staff Writer, Gizmodo | Send me tips:

Share This Story

Get our `newsletter`



I think it might behoove certain sectors of the internet and certain progressives to consider whether the rest of the country might actually be right about Snowden. At the end of the day he did break the law, and fled rather than face the consequences of that decision. This isn’t civil disobedience. Civil disobedience necessarily requires a recognition of lawful authority. It then highlights the absurdity of the exercise of that authority by intentionally submitting to it. By fleeing, Snowden implicitly denies that the United States government should or does have the lawful authority to punish him for his crimes. His exile and asylum thus function as an indictment of not just the system he exposed but the entire rule of law, whether he intends to or not. I think the American public can rightly condemn someone whose actions seek to or in fact do undermine the bedrock principle of democracy.

I think Bernie Sanders’s sentiment is the correct one. Snowden revealed information the American public deserved to know, but he did so by acting illegally and therefore needs to submit himself to the exercise of prosecutorial authority.

This also ignores the complicated issues regarding the actual illegality of the system he exposed. There’s a very good argument that bulk data collection is allowed under the Constitution so long as law enforcement officials only collect/access the metadata and not the actual contents of messages/underlying data until they receive a warrant. Snowden revealed that this collection could be terrifying in its scope and possibilities, and that it was subject to abuse internally, but not necessarily that it was illegal in and of itself.