What the researchers needed to do, Parfitt explains in the above video, which recounts the discovery, was uncover the impressions and photograph them from various angles so as to create 3D reconstructions of the site. One year later and the researchers have done exactly that – and what they've found is one of the most remarkable discoveries ever made on British shores.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Via the AP:

British Museum archaeologist Nick Ashton said the find — announced Friday and published in the journal PLOS ONE — was "a tangible link to our earliest human relatives."

Preserved in layers of silt and sand for millennia before being exposed by the tide last year, the prints give a vivid glimpse of some of our most ancient ancestors. They are from a group, including at least two children and one adult male. They could be a family foraging on the banks of a river scientists think may be the ancient Thames, beside grasslands where bison, mammoth, hippos and rhinoceros roamed.

The researchers said the humans who left the footprints may have been related to Homo antecessor, or "pioneer man," whose fossilized remains have been found in Spain. That species died out about 800,000 years ago.

Ashton said the footprints are between 800,000 — "as a conservative estimate" — and 1 million years old, at least 100,000 years older than the previous earliest evidence of human habitation in Britain.

Advertisement

Footprints believed to have been left by anatomically modern humans have previously been discovered in Africa, and date to as early as 1.5 million years ago.

"I imagine that there will be plenty of skeptics out there, as were we initially, but the more we eliminated the other possibilities, the more convinced we became," writes Ashton. "The sediments are hard and compacted – you can jump on them today and leave little impression. And there are no erosional processes that leave those sort of hollows."

Advertisement

The researchers' findings are slated to appear in a forthcoming issue of PLOS ONE. This link won't be active until the paper goes online; until then, I recommend heading to the BBC for Pallab Ghosh's excellent write-up, or the British Museum for Ashton's blog entry.