Uber Whistleblower Susan Fowler to Announce Bill Aimed at Ending Forced Arbitration for Workplace Abuses

Image for article titled Uber Whistleblower Susan Fowler to Announce Bill Aimed at Ending Forced Arbitration for Workplace Abuses
Photo: Getty

On Wednesday, former Uber engineer Susan Fowler along with California Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, the California Labor Federation, and the Economic Policy Institute will announce legislation that could have a crucial impact on fixing systemic sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace.


The bill, AB-3080, forbids employers from forcing employees or prospective job candidates into arbitration for sexual harassment and employment discrimination complaints.

A forced arbitration agreement means an employee forfeits their right to have their complaints heard by a jury. Instead, disputes are settled by a neutral third party (an arbitrator) behind closed doors, commonly keeping the outcome secret. Forced arbitration also usually includes a clause that prohibits employees from partaking in a class-action lawsuit.

Aside from making it an unlawful employment practice to include sexual harassment and California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) complaints in arbitration agreements, the bill also prohibits “an employer from threatening, retaliating or discriminating against, or terminating any applicant for employment or prospective employment or any employee because of the refusal to consent to the waiver of any right, forum, or procedure for a violation of specific statutes governing employment,” according to the bill.

Fowler told Gizmodo in a Twitter direct message that this bill is “important because it will prohibit companies from doing what Uber did to me: requiring that they waive their constitutional right to sue their employer in court if they ever experience illegal treatment.” She added:

“The systemic culture of harassment and discrimination that was rampant [at] Uber, throughout Silicon Valley, and throughout nearly every industry is kept hidden and allowed to flourish thanks to forced arbitration, which is a legal loophole that bad companies use to cover up illegal behavior.”

Uber did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Fowler has long advocated for the elimination of forced arbitration. A few months after she published her damning blog post detailing harassment and discrimination issues at Uber, Fowler penned another post listing five ways in which tech companies can improve. In it, she said that “the single most important thing a company can do to prove to its employees that it is dedicated to acting ethically, legally, responsibly, and transparently” is to end its forced arbitration agreements. Fowler herself was bound by arbitration as a condition of her employment with Uber.


“Forced arbitration deprives employees of their constitutional rights, and it forces employees who have been treated unlawfully to keep silent about what they have experienced,” Fowler wrote. “It is entirely in the interests of the company, and not the employee. It prevents harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and other unlawful treatment that employees have experienced from ever becoming public, and in doing so it continues and supports further mistreatment and unlawful behavior.”

Arbitration not only helps keep the reputation of a corporation intact by hiding controversial disputes, it also oftentimes doesn’t work in favor of employees, especially when it comes to sexual harassment and discrimination issues. “Arbitrators tend to be white and male,” Michael Subit, an employment attorney, told Gizmodo. “And older.”


The bill, introduced by assemblywoman Gonzalez Fletcher, will be heard by the committee on Wednesday at 11am PST at the California State Capitol.

“If this bill is passed, it will ensure that what happened to me and my coworkers at Uber will never happen again,” Fowler said.



Serolf Divad

We need a handful of brave politicians to kill: forced arbitration, abusive non-compete clauses in hiring contacts and NDA’s that violate the public interest. A sandwich shop should not be able to demand that its workers not work leave to work at other sandwich shops. And a tobacco company should not be able to sue its own scientists if they speak out on the dangers that its products pose to human health. Nor should a president be able to enforce NDA’s designed to keep the inner workings of his administration from the American people (or to keep potential sources of blackmail quiet).