Tech Corner claims these are photos of the upcoming Intel Netbook (not to be confused with its stationary Nettop counterpart) that runs Windows XP Pro "like a champ." The small, low-cost device is said to be Intel's education-centric answer to products like the Asus Eee PC and OLPC. Judging by the photos and Tech Corner's writeup, the laptop is about 10 inches in size with a 9-inch screen, under three pounds, has 512MB RAM, 40GB HDD and standard internet connections. But there are a couple of info bits that don't quite line up with previous reports.
Tech Corner claims the Netbook uses a 900 MHz Celeron processor and would sell for around $400. This contradicts reports that the upcoming Netbooks would be using the Intel Atom Diamondville processor and fall between the $250-$300 price range. However, claims of a June 2008 launch do seem to line up with those same reports.
Looking at its design, there's a handle attached to the back of the device, which looks a bit stupid. But if it's for the classroom, I guess we shouldn't care. And for a budget notebook, it looks pretty decent otherwise. We'll see come mid-year if this really is Intel's Netbook. [Flickr via Tech Corner]













Comments
Looks pretty thick... maybe it needs to go on a diet.
It's for the class room. Not for personal use. And what does intel know about style there the one's who think only the inside is what counts. They should be more like Apple...
It probably 'looks' thick due to its small size and horrible colour combination. I haven't seen that ugly grey in the world for a while...
if its not running the new 'atom' procs, i'm out.
Bring on the updated EEE PC!
It's for the classroom, but there's beer in the picture? My kinda classroom! Forget the rest of the specs, I think they finally found a way to get my kids interested in education!
Now if textbook publishers would join the 21st century kids wouldn't have to tote around 7 different books or fill a locker full of wasteful paper handouts.
I feel like making a toast to Intel for some strange reason
@Hypenotist: I teach high school and I can tell you that for at least the last 5 years every one of the science books I use has a free cd-rom the students can take home instead of the text. The disc contains the entire text book in a searchable PDF. I would say over those 5 yrs. about maybe 10% take the disc instead of the text. Guess its just something about a text book at home.
Woah, no way could Apple, Sony, and others compete with that. The economy is in a recession, and will hardly spend on cool products. Who the hell would buy this?
@Rob C: Why would you buy an eee pc in the first place???
IDK educational purposes ok thats for 3rd world countries.
Now for me that im upper middle class if not upper class i could afford to buy a new computer.
Nd best believe if im getting a laptop im getting the closest thing to a desktop that i can without the weight of a desktop.
Hopefully it doesnt run a 900mhz processor. Because instead of that we could all just send a whole bunch of xperia x1's to africa and let them have a cell phone, wifi, and WM6 computing goodness lmao!
way cooler than the air..
@rudeadly: If by "cooler" you mean "uglier" then yes.
I thought OLPCs were dead...
It's not that it has a handle on the back, it's that the handle is ugly as all crap.
In fact, much of it is.
That XP desktop looks pretty cool, though. Definitely an improvement over Vista.
The handle in the back looks like a cheap airplane neck cushion from Lillian Vernon. Perhaps doubling as a floatation device...wow! No way Apple will keep up now. Takes that Steve Jobs!
@Hypenotist: Well, I agree on the textbook part, but I love handouts. Better than writing it ourselves. There's no point on just wasting time copying it down, while we can spend that time discussing about it, delving in to the details.
that looks bad, really really bad. for the segment, specs are okay, but ugly shouldn't be accepted in any.
Specs are okay for the segment, ugly shouldn't be allowed in any.
@MrMaestr0: not this generation. theyre getting used to the textonscreen idea from growing up w/cells. give it 5 more years.
@SneakerFiend: Maybe you should think less about affording that new computer and more about affording a decent education... Perhaps you could use that Eee PC after all Mr. McDuck... ;)
@SpyderMS: Sorry for the double-post, but I forgot to add that there are plenty of reasons to buy an Eee PC that have absolutely nothing to do with it's cost. The low cost is simply icing on the cake. If you've read any of the many, many articles(?) here on the Giz about the Eee PC, and users comments associated with them, you would be well aware of this.
i think the eeeeeeeeeeeee pc is the crown in this market.
Well, right now the reason I don't forsee "the competitors" beat the Eee is its currently entrenched position. What the community has done for the Eee is a necessary part of adapting the tool for its market. They need to offer a machine with better specs, for the same price, and more importantly to look at what the community modded/adapted/installed/hacked on the Eee, and offer those things out of the box. People have replaced custom OS for more established ones (Ubuntu and XP)? Then offer Ubuntu or XP out of the box. People modded the machine to have a touchscreen? Sell it with a touchscreen.
These competitors aim to do the same thing Asus did. What they should aim for, is to do significantly BETTER than Asus. It might be difficult because Asus was willing to forgo a large profit margin per machine in order to get their name out there, while its competitors have typically kept the margins in this market high, but they'll have to adapt. Asus is no longer at the disadvantage it was before; the public that cares about laptop brands other than Apple and Dell have probably at least heard mention of the Eee by now. And most of the competitors are by even more obscure brands than Asus was; the general public has never heard about Acer, ECS, MSI, Everex, GeCube... They've heard about HP and Intel, but those are not brands the general public tend to have a strong opinion of (either for or against). On the other hand, if IBM, Sony, Apple or Dell came up with a serious competitor to the Eee, they'd have a good brand advantage.
i didn't want a beer. then i read this post. then i wanted a beer. mysterious!
Guys, seriously. You sound like a bunch of women here. Fashion over function. Look to what it is suppose to accomplish with a low attached cost not about the handle or what shade of gray is on it.
how come leaked pics never actually show the company's logo on the device?
@mikail511: Perhaps the companies hold out, just in case something is leaked, so they can deny the validity.
damn this is ugly
@mikail511: Indeed.
Some are so stupid in their statement...
IT'S NOT A FASHION DESIGN, it's for school for Xsake !!!
Main qualities should be Roughness and usability, NOT fashion...
Looks like the old Compaq 9000 series. That aside in my opinion, users are looking for functionality over design. Purchase the laptop that you can afford, use it a couple of years, pass it on to friends or family, buy something new. Computers are commodity products, they all do about the same thing, for 400 bucks, I would love to have this as my school computer.
@Dude27:
These are probably the same mouth-breathers calling the Toughbook out on it's styling.
Let 'em babble. They're clueless.
After all of the blingtastic crap-o-rama hardware encrusted with images of Hello Kitty, Mario and Zelda fanfare with their fruity colors and tasteless Liberace accessory appeal, THIS gets bitching?
I sort of like the goofy retro look of it. It may very well match my Napoleon Dynamite Moonboots!
@MrMaestr0: Reading a text is a lot nicer than reading a screen.
I sure do like the inflatable handle.
I have no idea that is why I come to Giz. So is it?
intel's laptop...from 1992?
It is sort of insane to see how everyone notes how "ugly" this looks when you have to think about how "ugly" the first computer must have looked and yet the fact that it could do so much was looked at as something amazing. The fact that there can be a laptop so affordable and usable for one's basic needs is what should be looked at. If anything, you can always design the laptop by putting stickers on the cover or something.
Anyway, I am sort of surprised it would have a 900 mhz processor seeing my first computer could probably handle half the size? I would love to see how the students use this.
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?