That is not a microsoft surface table. That's an optical screen, not a touch screen. See the weird symbols in those prisms? Those are sigils that a camera can track. The camera watches where those are, sends it to the computer, which then tells the projector behind the surface how to display the appropriate data.
I can't see the video, so maybe there's also some touch interactions, but there's also some cameras involved in making that work. #infractor
@t3knomanser: No touching, you are absolutely correct. And what is more pleasing to the eye than reading the newspaper from projected light? #infractor
@onishin: Did not realize that. Still, this is using the sigils that are designed for standard cameras and I've seen plans online for constructing such a device (and I've played with the software it uses, which is pretty solid). #infractor
Why?
1) It's already been stated from multiple sources that Apple is "in talk" with different publishers and companies about a new device, and bringing multimedia entertainment into what some may consider a bland (albeit old and tested) form of entertainment (this does NOT support my views, I prefer reading over gaming, in fact. I read anywhere from 20-30 hours a week, whereas my 360 gets about 5 hours a week of play-time).
2) If Apple is currently IN WORKS of developing said device, then certainly they would give the publishers a heads up, like, "Hey, this device is coming out, it's going to be the shit, and you should start developing for it. Now." Publishers need time, and if Apple wants ANY sort of publisher launch base with its said "tablet", then of course publishers are going to know about it now, especially if they plan for a debut at Macworld 2010. (remember they did this with the original iPhone; showed off the device at Macworld, launched June 29, 2007).
3) Apple has a hard-on for the NYT. Remember the first presentation and announcement of the iPhone at Macworld 2007? "Loads New York Times 2x faster than (insert competitor's phone name here)!" And again in 2008. "iPhone 3G loads New York Times x times faster than previous iPhone!"....AND again in 2009, "iPhone 3GS loads NYT x times faster than iPhone 3G!"
So yeah. I don't for a SINGLE second have any doubt that Bill Keller, of all people, would know about the new Apple product. Correct me if I'm wrong, but he should be among the first to know about the damned thing. Which only supports my belief that NYT knows about it, and just unofficially officially announced that the product is tangible, and is currently in development. #nytimesappletablet
The names people have thrown around—"iPad", "Macbook touch", "iTablet"—simply don't sound Appley. This is the first one I've heard that makes sense as a name they'd market it with. #nytimesappletablet
@bonedog73: Seems about as real as the Apple Tablet so far ... various artist renderings have popped up and been "no comment"ed on. #nytimesappletablet
@drewB: Lots of places. People have been calling it both for awhile. You'll see more tossed around too (though I can't think of any off the top of my head). Just because its a different name doesn't really lend any credence to it IMO. #nytimesappletablet
Sounds like he is just speculating, although Apple does advertise on their site a lot, so maybe it really is going to be called the Slate? #nytimesappletablet
everyone and their grandmothers have heard by now that there will be an Apple tablet released next year so what's so special about his comments? He is guessing like the rest of us. The fact of the matter is the probabilities are high that one will be released soon. #nytimesappletablet
If you want to track down a proper rumor then have someone look into that Kevin Rose tweet the other day about some girl working at Apple that said that the product will not take the form of a "tablet" that everyone is expecting.
There's probably nothing there either but it's probably more interesting than some guy over at NYTs who certainly doesn't know anything. #nytimesappletablet
I can imagine Jobs, sitting in his black velor chair, in his black velor turtleneck snuggie, sipping brandy from an aluminum goblet, telling his nameless assistant to arrange to have him killed.
Think outside the box. The NYTimes app is a great flashlight. After all, what else are you going to do when the politics articles don't load after 5 minutes.
11/05/09
I can't see the video, so maybe there's also some touch interactions, but there's also some cameras involved in making that work. #infractor
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
(And I don't have to listen to that spacey, new-age music while I read.)
This seems just a little like overkill, no? #infractor
11/05/09
10/26/09
Why?
1) It's already been stated from multiple sources that Apple is "in talk" with different publishers and companies about a new device, and bringing multimedia entertainment into what some may consider a bland (albeit old and tested) form of entertainment (this does NOT support my views, I prefer reading over gaming, in fact. I read anywhere from 20-30 hours a week, whereas my 360 gets about 5 hours a week of play-time).
2) If Apple is currently IN WORKS of developing said device, then certainly they would give the publishers a heads up, like, "Hey, this device is coming out, it's going to be the shit, and you should start developing for it. Now." Publishers need time, and if Apple wants ANY sort of publisher launch base with its said "tablet", then of course publishers are going to know about it now, especially if they plan for a debut at Macworld 2010. (remember they did this with the original iPhone; showed off the device at Macworld, launched June 29, 2007).
3) Apple has a hard-on for the NYT. Remember the first presentation and announcement of the iPhone at Macworld 2007? "Loads New York Times 2x faster than (insert competitor's phone name here)!" And again in 2008. "iPhone 3G loads New York Times x times faster than previous iPhone!"....AND again in 2009, "iPhone 3GS loads NYT x times faster than iPhone 3G!"
So yeah. I don't for a SINGLE second have any doubt that Bill Keller, of all people, would know about the new Apple product. Correct me if I'm wrong, but he should be among the first to know about the damned thing. Which only supports my belief that NYT knows about it, and just unofficially officially announced that the product is tangible, and is currently in development. #nytimesappletablet
10/26/09
10/26/09
Oh, wait ... wrong blog ... sorry #nytimesappletablet
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
(iS late) #nytimesappletablet
10/26/09
10/26/09
10/26/09
If you want to track down a proper rumor then have someone look into that Kevin Rose tweet the other day about some girl working at Apple that said that the product will not take the form of a "tablet" that everyone is expecting.
There's probably nothing there either but it's probably more interesting than some guy over at NYTs who certainly doesn't know anything. #nytimesappletablet
10/26/09
Interesting. #nytimesappletablet
10/26/09
10/26/09
11/10/08
This is exactly the kind of crap that shouldn't be in the AppStore. A native app for this is totally unnecessary. It'd be a perfectly usable webapp.
11/10/08
11/10/08