• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#windowsmobile#makeupeffortbringslovebackmicrosoft

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #whitenoise,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #broken,
  • etc.

New York, 6:58 PM
Fri Dec 18
68 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz

Chris Mascari

Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen

Kyle VanHemert

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of beercheck beercheck
    12/11/09

    In reply to Don't Wait Up for Windows Mobile 7
    Dammit.
     Reply
    beercheck was starred beercheck was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/11/09

    In reply to Don't Wait Up for Windows Mobile 7
    If Android's current growth is any indication, by late next year, Microsoft won't have a leg to stand on to wait that long. Android's app pool will be far larger, newer better handsets will be sporting newer, improved versions and their install base will be well-planted in droidsville. Windows Mobile will lose relevance a wee bit more, and Microsoft's hopes to regain foothold may no longer be determined by how good the OS is.

    I think it bears repeating that the Zune HD is a prime example of what being late and lazy does to good products.
     Reply
    Edited by Kaiser-Machead at 12/11/09 8:12 PM Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of DustyButt™ DustyButt™
    12/11/09

    @Kaiser-Machead: What better way to cut ties with a widely panned mobile OS than by announcing it's long, slow death. I think this is the plan to attempt a "fresh" start for the birth of the "Windows Phone" by sending WM7 on a separate trajectory.

    But, you're right... They can't drag things out it only makes the hole they've dug for themselves deeper.
     Reply
    DustyButt™ was starred DustyButt™ was unstarred
    Image of ibelli ibelli
    12/11/09

    In reply to Don't Wait Up for Windows Mobile 7
    MS has as much time as they want. They have the money, they have the resources, and if they come out with the super-dopeness in windows mobile 7, all the fickle-ass techno geeks will buy it. Don't front. Im not saying they will, but lets be real. If its hot, its hot. In this chase hot means a good UI, solid performance and good looks. Your move MS....
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead promoted this comment ibelli was starred ibelli was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/11/09

    @ibelli: Having money and resources does not necessarily guarantee you a great deal of time to delay new product releases. The time they take to dawdle means plenty of time for their competitors to sell handsets and dole out subsequent improvements, and ultimately cultivate a larger install base of people who are not just going to up and abandon their expensive hardware and service plans in droves. If Microsoft takes too long, a great deal of those fickle-ass techno geeks would have already moved on to some other handset.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of ibelli ibelli
    12/12/09

    @Kaiser-Machead: And what makes you think that when the "next big thing" comes around, that they wont jump ship to that? They always do, my friend. They always do... That's all I'm saying.
     Reply
    ibelli was starred ibelli was unstarred
    Image of DustyButt™ DustyButt™
    12/11/09

    In reply to Don't Wait Up for Windows Mobile 7
    MS has officially tapped out.They had plenty of time to put something together. What's it been, almost two years since they announced that they were working on WM7. You can stick a fork in their mobile hopes... if they had any.

    The only other thing I can think of is that they're pushing back "WM7" but the "Windows Phone" will be their (much earlier to be released) platform.
     Reply
    Edited by DustyButt™ at 12/11/09 7:46 PM DustyButt™ was starred DustyButt™ was unstarred
    Image of Glen Mitchell Glen Mitchell
    12/11/09

    In reply to Don't Wait Up for Windows Mobile 7
    seriously why is the zune hd team not fixing this broke platform
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards promoted this comment Glen Mitchell was starred Glen Mitchell was unstarred
    Image of Nathan Obbards Nathan Obbards
    12/11/09

    In reply to Don't Wait Up for Windows Mobile 7
    I'm not one to usually say this, but, seriously, MS, just give up already. Android is tanning your ass and geeks love it, BB OS is still loved and does great in the business world, OS X mobile is sweeping up amongst hipsters, fanboys, and, increasingly, business people. Short of creating a revolutionary phone OS that literally integrates every facet of your life or one similar to the Zune HD, there is no way that you'll retake that market share you've been pissing away. Focus on the other products that are done so well, like the 360 software, the Zune HD, the Courier concept, and W7.
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards was starred Nathan Obbards was unstarred
    Image of Raziel Raziel
    12/11/09

    @Nathan Obbards: I thought WinMo 7 was based on the Zune HD.
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards promoted this comment Raziel was starred Raziel was unstarred
    Image of Nathan Obbards Nathan Obbards
    12/11/09

    @Raziel: My understanding is that they share a similar core, but markedly different executions.
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards was starred Nathan Obbards was unstarred
    Image of beercheck beercheck
    12/09/09

    In reply to Skyfire 1.5 Brings More Speed, Less Ugly
    Still doesn't recognize my accelerometer for switching to landscape mode. Otherwise, nice update.
     Reply
    beercheck was starred beercheck was unstarred
    Image of Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow
    12/09/09

    In reply to Skyfire 1.5 Brings More Speed, Less Ugly
    Hopefully, this helps:

    I am using Skyfire 1.5 on my Sprint Touch Pro 2 while posting this comment.

    It took a little working around just to sign in to Giz but I was able to get on and stay on.

    IE Mobile and Opera Mobile do not work with Giz/Gawk like this edition of Skyfire.

    For now, I say 'thumbs up'.
     Reply
    Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow was starred Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow was unstarred
    Image of ninja in pajamas ninja in pajamas
    12/09/09

    @Dr. Evil Genius has learned that MILF stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front: Hey Doc, dunno if you have tried signing into Giz on Opera Mini, but it works flawlessly on there. Also commenting from skyfire. I'm lucky enough to have not had any issues signing in on here.
     Reply
    Dr. Evil Genius has learned that MILF stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front promoted this comment ninja in pajamas was starred ninja in pajamas was unstarred
    Image of Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow
    12/09/09

    @ninja in pajamas: I have tried with Opera Mobile 9.5 but the browser automatically goes to the mobile version of the site. When I went to the "Full Site", it never shows the 'login' link at all.

    This has been my experience using Opera Mobile. Is there a difference between Opera Mobile and Mini?
     Reply
    Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow was starred Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow was unstarred
    Image of ninja in pajamas ninja in pajamas
    12/09/09

    @Dr. Evil Genius has learned that MILF stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front: Also, mini tends to load pages much faster since the work is done on Operas end much like skyfire. It will still default to the mobile site, but generally has no major issues when you go to the full version.c
     Reply
    ninja in pajamas was starred ninja in pajamas was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    12/09/09

    In reply to Skyfire 1.5 Brings More Speed, Less Ugly
    soooo, for those not in the loop -- what platform is skyfire for?
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of Davy Grolton Davy Grolton
    12/09/09

    @Nick: Windows Mobile. I believe anything 6.1 and above.

    I had the beta on my moto Q back in the day, and it was wonderful.
     Reply
    Nick promoted this comment Davy Grolton was starred Davy Grolton was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    12/09/09

    @Davy Grolton: yeah, i eventually clicked through. i didn't see a windows button on the handset pictured and thought maybe android.
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow
    12/09/09

    @Davy Grolton: Not to be a detail-nazi but I believe that this download is compatible with WinMo 5.0 and higher for all those very, very late adopters.
     Reply
    Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow was starred Dr. Evil Genius is eagerly anticipating the Year of the Black Rainbow was unstarred
    Image of Davy Grolton Davy Grolton
    12/09/09

    @Dr. Evil Genius has learned that MILF stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front: Yup. Just checked. Available for WM 5.0 - 6.5. Also available for symbian S60 3rd edition.

    It's a terrific little browser. Definately worth it if you're running WM or S60.
     Reply
    Davy Grolton was starred Davy Grolton was unstarred
    Image of Jack_Burton Jack_Burton
    12/07/09

    In reply to It's Time To Make Phone OSes Work On Any Phone
    WebOS, iPhone OS, and Android are all *NIX with HTML and Javascript on top. Except for Windows Mobile, most of the smartphone market has some form of *NIX / Java blend.

    VMware would really shake things up if it blurred the barriers of hardware. I don't think the carriers will go for it, though. Handset vendors won't care as much, except Apple, whose whole game is "the total user experience" anyway.
     Reply
    Jack_Burton was starred Jack_Burton was unstarred
    Image of QuarterToTomorrow QuarterToTomorrow
    12/08/09

    @Jack_Burton: While webOS and Android run on top of the Linux kernel and iPhone OS is Darwin (way waaay down), this doesn't mean they're compatible. As far as I'm aware, none of them are Posix compliant, they all run completely different toolchains and userlands, and apps are written in JavaScript on webOS, Java on Android and Objective-C on iPhone.

    (nb Java != JavaScript)
     Reply
    Jack_Burton promoted this comment QuarterToTomorrow was starred QuarterToTomorrow was unstarred
    Image of Jack_Burton Jack_Burton
    12/08/09

    @QuarterToTomorrow: I never said they were compatible, just that they had similar components in their underlying architecture. Have you ever used VMWare? It's a hardware abstraction layer that goes between the device and the host OS.

    My point is that VMWare would have less work to do as far as supporting basic I/O since it would be piping in a manner similar in all 3 OSes. They are more similar than dissimilar.
     Reply
    Jack_Burton was starred Jack_Burton was unstarred
    Image of something_unique_and_descriptive something_unique_and_descriptive
    12/07/09

    In reply to It's Time To Make Phone OSes Work On Any Phone
    As long as the devices are dependent on carrier distribution it's not going to happen. As it is right now if you want WinMo and Android, you buy two phones, they subsidize one (which locks you into a contract) and then sell you the second for additional profit.

    There are so many things f**ked the hell up with the wireless industry the ability to load your own OS barely even registers on the radar. How about we start by getting the carriers to discount service for those of us whose devices they aren't subsidizing. Once that happens buying unlocked becomes a much better value proposition, then with the carriers, and their desire for artificial market segmentation, out of the way a multi-boot smartphone might be possible.

    People from the FCC / congress, if you're reading this, make it happen.
     Reply
    something_unique_and_descriptive was starred something_unique_and_descriptive was unstarred
    Image of Mikestan Mikestan
    12/07/09

    In reply to It's Time To Make Phone OSes Work On Any Phone
    I think the Corporate Gods learned their lesson from computers and there is no way in hell they are going to give you "freedom" with their mobile phones
     Reply
    Mikestan was starred Mikestan was unstarred
    Image of sp00nix sp00nix
    12/07/09

    In reply to It's Time To Make Phone OSes Work On Any Phone
    This would cause them to be bloated and over packed with drivers like windows.
     Reply
    fuchikoma promoted this comment sp00nix was starred sp00nix was unstarred
    Image of fuchikoma fuchikoma
    12/07/09

    @sp00nix: Exactly. Then in time, we'd probably be paying penalties for backward hardware compatibility with things like battery life and extra CPU cycles because the generic way of doing something is more universal than the optimized platform-specific method.

    Even if the only parts installed on the phone were modules to enable the OS with that phone (more likely) I would rather have a proprietary phone too dumb to catch a crossplatform virus that puts my notes and contacts at risk of deletion, exposure, or exploitation. From a security standpoint it's already unfortunate enough that people with smartphones put my info on their contact lists... security really seems to have been the very last consideration in the maturation of smartphones as a common device.
     Reply
    fuchikoma was starred fuchikoma was unstarred
    Image of Cameron Barker Cameron Barker
    12/07/09

    @fuchikoma:
    Then we should be demanding more of our Smartphone OS developers.

    At the heart of the issue, I agree with your cynicism in regards to past experiences with PC OSes. However, just as we continue to demand more of Microsoft and Apple, so too should we demand more from the folks at Google, Palm, Symbian, RIM, etc...
     Reply
    fuchikoma promoted this comment Cameron Barker was starred Cameron Barker was unstarred
    Image of e.parker.pierce e.parker.pierce
    12/07/09

    @fuchikoma: But the HD2 vs. the Droid vs. any ARM vs. any Snapdragon phone - their specs are not wildly different, and we've seen that Android can run on a Snapdragon and WinMo can run on an ARM and vice versa. Why does killer hardware have to be stuck with a broken OS? I'm not a programmer - what is really stopping a smartphone from running a different OS? Aside from money, of course.
     Reply
    fuchikoma approved this comment e.parker.pierce was starred e.parker.pierce was unstarred
    Image of fuchikoma fuchikoma
    12/07/09

    @e.parker.pierce: Apart from licensing concerns and platform openness, I think the technical hurdles are in the fact that the OS must me compiled/made for the CPU on the device. Even in cases where it can be tricked into running on a similar platform, you would face challenges like running OSX on unlicensed notebooks - it may work, but be terribly slow, or lack audio, or lack network card drivers, and so on.

    Money is also a big factor - you said aside from money, but imagine the resources it would take for a developer to port an OS to every handset that had the specs to run it. Presumably the handset makers would do this, but then you'd end up with a single non-proprietary OS that runs on that phone, because it's not worth their resource expenditure to prepare all the other OSes.

    They could just make a standard smartphone platform spec list and start making smartphone OSes generic from that point on to run on anything that meets the specs, but that may also keep the makers from moving to a newer CPU architecture, or make new-ish versions, but still support all of the old legacy instructions as it has for PCs in the last 30 years. A new feature like biometric authentication may become the norm, but not be supported in some OSes for a while, leading them to pick a different one, or hack support into it unofficially, possibly with consequences like crashing or incomplete support.

    I think overall there are a lot of reasons for and against crossplatform phone OSes, and a lot of factors that would make it doable, or hard to do. Personally though, what I've found is that the OSes we have, single or multiplatform, aren't mature enough to branch out to a far far harder to support model just yet. If you think it's bad having phones "stuck with a broken OS" now, just imagine if the same people who made that OS had to make it for hundreds of phones they would never even see in person. I'd imagine it will at least become an option in time, and it's becoming far more likely with platforms like Android, but I think it will be a while before you can put any phone OS on any phone, if ever.

    Finally, hopefully this last reason will fade into obsolescence, but the carriers hate to give the customer any sort of control over their phones. It might allow you to use the phone on another carrier, so despite buying it, they will still lock it down so it cannot be modified or reconfigured. The way around this is to buy a unique phone that DOES allow customization and OS tweaking, for its full, unsubsidized cost. The OpenMoko FreeRunner tried this with a Linux-based phone, but it's not a popular option, or even easy to find... but in theory you can keep running the Linux based OS and write any apps you want for it, or mod the OS as you see fit. Theoretically you could write another OS for it right now, but I'm not aware of anyone who has.
     Reply
    fuchikoma was starred fuchikoma was unstarred
    Image of MrGrinch MrGrinch
    12/07/09

    In reply to It's Time To Make Phone OSes Work On Any Phone
    windows xp for gaming?? what games are you playing?!
     Reply
    Hearthatvoiceagain promoted this comment MrGrinch was starred MrGrinch was unstarred
    Image of Hearthatvoiceagain Hearthatvoiceagain
    12/07/09

    @MrGrinch: Minesweeper probably
     Reply
    Hearthatvoiceagain was starred Hearthatvoiceagain was unstarred
    Image of blash blash
    12/07/09

    In reply to It's Time To Make Phone OSes Work On Any Phone
    Honestly I just don't know why no one has hacked the Android OS to run on the iPhone. Would seem like a no-brainer, right? Android is open-source, geek-oriented, and the iPhone is ubiquitous enough to merit serious 3rd party free-unlocking and pirate app support (and by pirate here I don't mean piracy, I mean not sanctioned by Apple).
     Reply
    blash was starred blash was unstarred
    Image of microlithx microlithx
    12/07/09

    @blash:
    The iPhone's hardware precludes the loading of other OSes. One of the core means of doing this is via booting from a microSD card which the iPhone famously lacks.
     Reply
    blash promoted this comment Kaila Hale-Stern approved this comment microlithx was starred microlithx was unstarred
    Image of blash blash
    12/07/09

    @microlithx: Yeah but hackers have been able to access everything from root to the baseband. If they can do all that, why can't they boot something that lets them write new firmware to allow them to boot a new OS off the included storage? Is there some part of the iPhone that still hasn't been torn apart in software in some way?
     Reply
    blash was starred blash was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.