The Future Is Here
We may earn a commission from links on this page

Apple Bows to Queen Taylor, Does Abrupt About-Face Over Unpaid Streaming

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Earlier today, noted hater of streaming music Taylor Swift published an open letter to Apple, blasting its decision to not pay artists during the three-month free trial for Apple Music. A few hours later, it appears that Apple got the message, and is changing its policy on paying artists.

In a series of messages posted on Twitter, Apple SVP of Internet Software and Services Eddy Cue (also known as Apple’s Mr Fix-It) reaffirmed the company’s dedication to indie artists, and more importantly, announced that Apple will pay artists for streams during the three-month trial period.


In the wake of the Apple Music announcement, record labels and artists have been appreciative of Apple’s industry-high revenue-sharing offer (Apple is offering artists 71.5% of revenues, versus a standard 70%), but labels — in particular those representing indie artists — blasted the company’s decision not to pay artists anything during customers’ three-month free trial.

Although Apple argued that the higher revenue share would lead to greater payouts over time, artists worried that anyone releasing a new album during the first three months of Apple Music’s existence would receive diddly squat.

Although this is a big win for Ms Swift, there’s a few questions that still need answering: namely, will 1989 now be available on Apple Music, and how much revenue will Apple be sharing with artists during the 3-month trial period?


Update: According to Recode’s Peter Kafka, Apple will be paying artists on a different, per-stream basis during the free trial, rather than the revenue-sharing model used for paying subscribers.

Contact the author at