David Pogue: "Smartphone Is Too Limited...It's An App Phone"

Illustration for article titled David Pogue: iSmartphone/i Is Too Limited...Its An iApp Phone/i

Before David Pogue wrote his review of the Droid, he had trouble deciding what to call the device. He argued that "smartphone" is an outdated label for the "iPhone-like" devices coming out and so he looked for a new one.

Advertisement

Our Jason Chen discussed this issue in the past and coined the term "com," but here's Pogue's take:

What should we call these iPhone-like, touch screen Wi-Fi phones with music and video, real Web browsers, e-mail, sensors (light, tilt, location, proximity), and, above all, app stores? These machines can download thousands of free or cheap add-on programs - "apps" - and become GPS units, musical instruments and medical equipment.

"Smartphone" is too limited. A smartphone is a cellphone with e-mail - an old BlackBerry, a Blackjack, maybe a Treo. This new category - somewhere between cellphones and laptops, or even beyond them - deserves a name of its own.

I invited suggestions on Twitter. The best came from @mentalworkout: "app phone." Bingo. Apps distinguish iPhonish phones from mere smartphones, so "app phones" it is.

Advertisement

I disagree with both Chen and Pogue and prefer to think of the gadgets as "Things I Can't Live Without," but what do you think they should be called? [NY Times]

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

poisonborz
poisonborz

This is just stupid, "Apps" are here since ages. Why does everyone think that the iPhone was the first phone that could have applications... I could download map software to my Nokia 6630 in 2005. Or should I mention java apps for my 3410i in 1999? They also enabled additional functionality. So where is the distinction...? #appphone