Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know and expect about
the most important election of our lifetime.

Feds Find Fourth Amendment Workaround, Buy Phone Locations From Marketing Firms

A U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent aims his weapon from a Black Hawk helicopter while pursuing a truck with suspected undocumented immigrants on February 21, 2018 in McAllen, Texas.
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent aims his weapon from a Black Hawk helicopter while pursuing a truck with suspected undocumented immigrants on February 21, 2018 in McAllen, Texas.
Photo: John Moore (Getty

Sidestepping the need to obtain a search warrant, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reportedly been accessing phone location data belonging to millions of Americans by buying it straight from private marketing firms. The data is drawn from seemingly ordinary phone apps, including mobile games and weather apps, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Advertisement

DHS uses the data purchased from private marketing companies to generate law enforcement leads and search for undocumented immigrants, according to the Journal, which first broke news of the arrangements on Friday.

In a landmark 2018 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects cellphone location information. As a result, police are required to obtain a warrant before obtaining location data. But according to the Journal, government lawyers have argued that a warrant is not required because the data is already commercially available.

Advertisement

The government’s procurement of location data from private marketing companies for law enforcement purposes was a secret, until now.

The Journal reports that DHS and agencies under its umbrella, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement, purchased location data as far back as 2017 from a small Virginia-based company called Venntel Inc. According to the Journal, the data was recently used to track the phones of people suspected of smuggling drugs through a tunnel from Mexico to Arizona.

Venntel acknowledges serving government clients on its website, which says its platform “merges, categorizes and interprets disparate location data.” The company says it provides “global coverage” as well as access to “historical data.”

Advertisement

DHS and Venntel did not immediately respond to Gizmodo’s requests for comment.

Neither the names of the marketing firms from which Venntel reportedly purchased the location data nor the phone apps used to collect the data are named in the Journal’s report.

Advertisement

A Customs and Border Protection official told the Journal that the data is not “ingested in bulk” and “doesn’t include cellular phone tower data.” The data reportedly points to devices represented by an “alphanumeric advertising identifier,” but does not include the cellphone owner’s name.

Claims that location data is anonymized—or pseudonymized—are all but meaningless. Researchers have repeatedly shown the techniques advertising companies employ to anonymize data are faulty and inadequate.

Advertisement

Last year, for example, researchers at the Imperial College of London published a study showing they were able to accurately re-identify 99.98 percent of Americans in anonymized datasets.

And just this month, students at Harvard University revealed they’d built a tool that links personally identifiable information to anonymized consumer data exposed by data breaches.

Advertisement

“DHS should not be accessing our location information without a warrant, regardless whether they obtain it by paying or for free,” Nathan Freed Wessler, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told Gizmodo. “The failure to get a warrant undermines Supreme Court precedent establishing that the government must demonstrate probable cause to a judge before getting some of our most sensitive information, especially our cell phone location history.”

“We will be demanding the government turn over all records concerning this disturbing practice, which is just the latest example of the extreme lengths the Trump administration will go to carry out its cruel and heartless immigration policies,” Wessler added. 

Advertisement

Senior Reporter, Privacy & Security

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Brutalitarian
Brutalitarian

Legally whats the difference between buying the data and asking for it from the service provider? Not an expert on the American legal system so its genuine question not taking the piss.