If Marvel Had Owned Watchmen, That Big DC Rebirth Twist Might Have Come Sooner

Illustration for article titled If Marvel Had Owned Watchmen, That Big DC Rebirth Twist Might Have Come Sooner

The bombshell is out: Rebirth has made the Watchmen part of the DC comics universe, and turned at least one of them into the biggest antagonist in the cosmos. It’s been a controversial twist, but would DC’s biggest competitor have done it, given the chance? According to Marvel Editor Tom Brevoort, absolutely.

Advertisement

Comic Book Resources recently sat down with Brevoort to discuss Marvel’s upcoming event series Civil War II, but also took the time to ask him about the release of Rebirth (and the timing of that comic’s release and Marvel’s own big twist with Captain America, which Brevoort claims is a total coincidence).

Brevoort had nothing but kind words to say about the Watchmen canonization, but then added if Marvel owned a franchise like that, it would’ve cannibalized it into its own vast canon a lot sooner than DC:

I’m kind of conflicted in terms of the central twist that is revealed there, because philosophically as a fan, I kind of feel like that work is a complete work, and I’ve liked the fact that people have stayed away from it, except in really recent memory, and let it be its own thing. On the flipside of that, as the guy that does all this publishing for Marvel, I know that if that book was in our back catalogue, there would definitely have been interaction by this point, and it probably would have happened much sooner. So I can’t fault them for doing exactly what I would do, at least in the abstract, if I had the publishing rights.

DC has largely kept the Watchmen at a distant arm’s length simply because of the controversy surrounding any attempt to follow up on Alan Moore, Dave Gibbons, and John Higgins’ legendary piece of superheroic fiction.

Moore and the company have long had a publicly bitter relationship over the rights to Watchmen (which would’ve only reverted back to Moore’s control if DC stopped publishing and reprinting the graphic novel and associated works—something that will not happen any time soon now, thanks to Rebirth), and the last time DC attempted to tell new stories with the characters, in Before Watchmen, it was not exactly well regarded by fans. So it’s interesting to see Brevoort imagining that Marvel would’ve done this all a lot more quickly than DC has.

Advertisement

Rebirth has at least been met with some optimism, even with the Watchmen twist. Would the reaction have been the same if this was “Marvel Rebirth”? Man, I want to see that alternate reality.

James is a News Editor at io9, where you can find him delivering your morning spoilers, writing about superheroes, and having many feelings about Star Wars. He wants pictures. Pictures of Spider-Man!

DISCUSSION

cryptid
Cryptid

Tom Brevoort is so damn sane. Perhaps there is an element of calculation, but he sounds like a person rather than a mouthpiece in his interviews. His answers sound like answers instead of miniature press-releases.

The real headline is that DC is putting the nail in the coffin of the Vertigo experiment. There was a moment in the 80s and 90s when they were fostering creators’ voices if not their contractual rights. The decision to absorb that material back into the shared universe misunderstands works as franchises. It’s honest of Brevoort to point out that sacred cows are for readers, not publishers, but it’s still disappointing that DC’s sense of the genre and the medium appear to be shrinking and shrinking.

The exciting thing about Vertigo was the sense that even mainstream comics were expanding beyond the confines of the superhero genre. There was suddenly continuity between the capes and the experimental fringe, the kind of spectrum you see in film and prose fiction. At DC, that’s gone now. The most experimental books in their New 52 line-up, the ones that ventured into horror and other genres, were generally the first to drop. And most of the mainstream movies and shows based on comics reflect the same narrowness.