Steve Jobs Is a Very Entertaining Movie About How It’s OK to Be an Asshole

Illustration for article titled Steve Jobs Is a Very Entertaining Movie About How It’s OK to Be an Asshole

Five minutes into Steve Jobs, I didn’t think I was gonna make it.

I am, indeed, a product of the attention-deficit generation whose mind was ruined by the “beautiful” ideas of Steve Jobs. I’ve heard the stories about Jobs’ meticulous obsession with details, and his mercurial, uncompromising personality. How could I not? They’ve been etched on our public consciousness with an endless stream of books, movies, TV specials, magazine articles. Steve Jobs jumps right into establishing these genius and asshole personalities right from the start: It’s 1984, and there’s Steve Jobs fretting about the fine points of the Macintosh unveiling event. He’s being meticulous and an asshole. “Ugh, Shit,” I thought. “Not this again. I can’t sit through this again.”

Advertisement

Hella spoilers ahead—but you know what happens at the end, right?

Then five minutes later, I was saddled in my seat barely blinking, my brain chewing every word of Aaron Sorkin’s delicious script. You’ve seen a Sorkin movie before? Characters chat in dense, witty paragraphs. No one in reality talks like this, but listening to the dramatic portrayals of Steve Jobs and Joanna Hoffman (deftly played by Michael Fassbender and Kate Winslet) when they’re written like conflicted heroes in a Shakespeare play is great fun. This is Sorkin, for sure. You’re able to dissociate the story you’re watching from the story you’ve heard a million times. This isn’t a trite tech biopic. It’s just great cinema.

Sorkin’s story benefits from its structure. It’s a three-act play, really. There are three long scenes, each set in the 30 or so minutes before three major product launches: the 1984 launch of the Macintosh, the 1988 launch of the Nextcube, and finally the 1998 launch of the iMac. Each of the scenes takes place in real time, such that a minute of screen time is a minute in the world of the film. Danny Boyle renders the the script to life with wonderful direction.

In each section, Jobs navigates backstage areas like a general parading around a military encampment, arguing with key figures in his life: His former lover Chrisann Brennan, his daughter with Brennan, Lisa, his best friend Steve Wozniak, his confidant and Apple marketing executive Joanna Hoffman, former software engineer Andy Hertzfeld, and former Apple CEO John Sculley.

And argue with them he does! This guy liked to argue, we’re meant to understand. It’s a good thing too, because not a whole hell of a lot is happening in this movie. It’s just people talking, so it might have been really boring if everyone was getting along with each other.

Jobs doesn’t come off real well. He’s unconscionably rude and difficult with everyone around him. He treats everyone like shit. Sure, he’s the boss, and he’s stressed out before a product launch. But his daughter? At first he refuses to even acknowledge that she’s his daughter. He grows into it, and the film ends on a gauzy note between the two. Just before Jobs takes the stage to announce the iMac—the first Jobs product to really change things—he shares a tender moment of light mutual understanding with his then-19-year old daughter. Aw, cute.

Advertisement

The movie isn’t naive about who Jobs was. When Alex Gibney’s critical documentary about Jobs was released last month, I noted that it’s important to acknowledge what a shitfuck Jobs was to everyone around him. For its part, Steve Jobs doesn’t shy away off highlighting Jobs’ difficult personality. It does try to explain it away a little bit with a portrayal that says that he was damaged by a sense of rejection from having been put up for adoption by his parents.

Movies don’t need to have morals, and this isn’t a documentary. Theoretically, anyway. But a question I’ve been pondering with all of the Jobs media that’s been released in the years since his death is whether or not we absolve Jobs for his assholishness, just because he was a genius who had a huge positive impact on the world. Is it OK? Do we let him off the hook for the fuck ups, and the people he laid off because his hubris led him down the wrong path? Do we forgive the immorality of his throwing executives under the bus to get himself off the hook for securities fraud? Is it all right that he denied his own daughter, because they made up 20 years later?

Advertisement

The Sorkin-Boyle portrait is certainly nostalgic about the man. It’s hard not to be. He was electric. He’s an icon. For all the jerkiness portrayed in the film, of course they let him go.

People on both sides of the “he was a jerk”/“he was a hero” divide have complained that the movie doesn’t represent fact. Sorkin has been upfront that portions of the movie are complete inventions. For example, John Sculley and Jobs never spoke again after Jobs was fired from Apple following the Macintosh disaster, and yet, the ex-CEO appears at two keynotes in the film he didn’t actually attend.

Advertisement

Luckily, I don’t think we’re expected to view Steve Jobs as an expression of fact about the man. Think of it as a gripping, witty drama. That way, it’s not really all that important whether or not they give a happy spin to a the transgressions of a sociopath. It’s just a fun movie to watch! If you want to get bogged down by the meaning and legacy of the Jobs myth vs the reality, well, this movie is probably just going to piss you off.

Advertisement

DISCUSSION

vinylrake

But a question I’ve been pondering with all of the Jobs media that’s been released in the years since his death is whether or not we absolve Jobs for his assholishness, just because he was a genius who had a huge positive impact on the world. Is it OK? Do we let him off the hook for the fuck ups, and the people he laid off because his hubris led him down the wrong path? Do we forgive the immorality of his throwing executives under the bus to get himself off the hook for securities fraud? Is it all right that he denied his own daughter, because they made up 20 years later?

No, it’s not OK to let him off the hook for anything - especially how he treated people, including his own daughter. If you are a person who believes that humans are complex and are never just good or evil you might be able to hold the not-mutually exclusive idea that while Jobs was a genius of marketing (or at least in being a half-step ahead of his competitors in figuring out what the public wanted before the public knew it) and putting other people’s ideas together in newish ways and making it seem brand new, he was also a pretty horrible generally immoral (or at least amoral) person who treated other people he came in contact with really badly.


I hate to use the comparison because in terms of raw creativity there is no comparison, but in regards to legacy/accomplishments vs. person himself, Jobs is a lot like John Lennon. Lennon wrote some great music and tried to good in the last few years of his life, but he treated his first wife and son from that marriage horribly, basically abandoning them when he met Yoko and leaving them 75K pounds in the divorce settlement. He set up a trust of 100K (pounds) that Julian would split with any other kids Lennon had later. I get new love and all that, but after the divorce Lennon moved from England to the US seeing Julian once a year at most and sometimes didn’t even see his son for YEARS leaving him to be raised by his single mom, while his new wife and new son lived in a rich lifestyle in NYC... and when he died he left NOTHING to Julian.

Also - “he was a genius who had a huge positive impact on the world” - please tell me exactly what ‘huge positive impact’ you think Jobs had on the world? Exploitation of Chinese laborers who worked at Apple-suppliers under conditions so severe many killed themselves? Is it that he popularized the mouse? Eliminated the floppy drive and CD-Rom drives? Made really shiny laptops and all-in-one computers? Popularized smart phones furthering the decline of civil society as millions of people became addicted to being online 24-7? What is this huge positive impact you speak of? Serious question. And ‘designing products millions of people use’ doesn’t count unless you can articulate what benefit those products have that are unique to Apple products.

TL:DR; Talented people can be complete a**holes, as both Jobs and Lennon demonstrate.

(and I say all this as both a Beatle and Mac fan)