Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Straight From Sam Walton's Mouth: New Details on Wal-Mart Movie Download Service

Illustration for article titled Straight From Sam Waltons Mouth: New Details on Wal-Mart Movie Download Service
Advertisement

We have a lot of new details about Wal-Mart's movie download service—it is, as some feared, not as full-featured as we would have hoped, but it was repeatedly emphasized throughout the conversation that the service is very much in the "early beta stage," so they're "primarily focused on... improving what [they] offer." Full rundown follows.

That said, here are some numbers. Movies come in two sizes: the larger "PC" size and the smaller portable one. They dodged the question about the resolution of movies (supposedly they're getting back to us and when they do, we'll let you know) but the PC version is "near DVD quality," which is to say it has a bit rate of around 1.3-1.6 Mbps. TV shows, on the other hand, are decidedly focused on being quick downloads, with a bit rate of 500-800 Kbps for the file.

Advertisement

All of the files are WMV for the time being, and are encrypted with Windows Media DRM. You can burn them for back up—they encourage customers to do so—but right now they're stuck on a single PC with the option to move them to up to "three compatible portable devices." They are working to the expand that, however. Moreover, only PCs (XP and higher) and only IE 6 and up. Firefox support is coming.

As we said earlier, they offer "3000 productions." This is "about evenly split" between movie and TV content, with each episode of a show counting as a single production in that number. No ABC, Fox, CBS or NBC yet, but they're working on it and "would like to be in business with everybody."

The way they got to be in business with "everybody" in the movie business, we should note, is by closely following the studios' set prices for movie downloads, which are designed not to cannibalize physical DVD sales. (Steve Jobs's refusal to cater to that price point, along with the fear of an iTunes monopoly, is why he as of yet, only has Paramount and Disney on board with iTunes.) Strongly emphasized throughout the interview was Wal-Mart's committal to ensuring a strong DVD market.

To that end, we found out how the discounts for consumers who buy both DVDs and digital movies works. Basically, when you buy the physical DVD, you will get a code allowing you to download the "portable" version of the movie for $1.97, the PC version for $2.97, and both for $3.97. (Much like they did with Superman Returns back in November.) This will be the major way the service is pushed and utilized, at least initially. Obviously, the service isn't intended to disrupt traditional means of movie watching.

Advertisement

Part of the non-disruptiveness is given Wal-Mart's view that "the business is new now," and they (along with everyone else) still "need to figure out how it works." So no big marketing campaign, at least for a while. It'll be featured on the site, and there will be some in-store promotion, but nothing big. It's still very much all about the physical Wal-Mart store, but expanding into "multi-channel and multi-format" distribution.

Lastly, while we're not thrilled with the current price points, it was clearly stated that the studio "sets the price," and Wal-Mart is pursuing and will continue to advocate for "a good price for the customer," which we interpret to mean lower prices.

Advertisement

If this service fails, the blame rests mostly on Hollywood's shoulders, since most of these terms were dictated by the studios. Middle America isn't the target for this service, at least for right now, largely due to its beta status, but also, we think, because of the unnecessary restrictions placed on it by the studios, making it too complicated for Wal-Mart's core customers. And that is a big mistake on the part of the "Big Six," one they may soon pay for.

Wal-Mart First to Offer Digital Movies From All "Big Six" Studios [Gizmodo]

Advertisement

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Thanks Matt, for the last most important paragraph of your article. Sadly, the last paragraph should be the first, and last to any argument about distribution of copywrited content (music, movies, books). The classical safeguarders of that-traditionaly the BMI, WarnerBros, Disneys, ad finitum, are actually the ones responsible for this mess...and are the ones who are rightly to blame. Mr jobs said it rather loudly, finally, yesterday, you dribbled upon it in your last paragraph. but, there IS NO ARGUEMENT about DRM without it bing told who is DEMANDIDING DRM-namely those age old, crumbling institutional systems that we have come to know as 'record companies', 'movie studios' and the like, who steal from both the amazing artist who rightfully should get paid more directly for their cultural contribution to humanity, AND the public at large, who would prefer to pay a dollar to the musician to hear his song than 20 to the record company who will 'commoditize' the artist, and eventually pay him 50 cents for the service of distribution.

Rant, i know, but would prefer if we all really kept it together and simply attacked attacked attacked the record and movie companies. Even attacking the RIAA is wasting bullets.

Thanks mr jobs for directing the argument back to where it needs to be. Move the last paragraph up to the top please.