To Prevent the Next Pandemic, Leave Animals Alone

A worker sprays disinfectant near the tiger cages at Alipore Zoological Garden in Kolkata.
A worker sprays disinfectant near the tiger cages at Alipore Zoological Garden in Kolkata.
Photo: Getty

Over the weekend, a tiger at the Bronx zoo tested positive for covid-19. The weird occurrence raised questions about the zoonotic transmission of covid-19. Did Joe Exotic have anything to do with this? (Probably not). Did the tiger contract the virus from human contact? Can the tiger infect humans? How can we limit the spread of viruses between people to animals?


We don’t know exactly how the tiger contracted the coronavirus, but we do know that it’s zoonotic disease, meaning it’s caused by a bacteria, parasite, or in this case, a virus that spreads from animals to humans. New research has found that to limit “virus spillover” of these illnesses, we should stop messing with animals’ natural habitats.

In a paper published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B on Tuesday, researchers found that the risk for viruses to spread to humans from animals increases when we exploit wildlife through land use practices, agriculture, and hunting.

“Spillover of viruses from animals is a direct result of our actions involving wildlife and their habitat,” lead author Christine Kreuder Johnson, project director of USAID PREDICT and director of the EpiCenter for Disease Dynamics at the University of California’s One Health Institute, said in a statement. “The consequence is they’re sharing their viruses with us.”

Removing animals from their natural habitats can stress them out, which increases the risk that those creatures will spread diseases. And when humans spend time around those stressed animals—whether that’s on a farm or out hunting—we risk exposure to high viral loads.

The authors identified 142 cases of zoonotic viruses spreading to people. Then, using the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species, they teased out patterns in the way those species have been affected by human action. The study traced half of the new diseases that animals transmitted to humans after 1940 to hunting, trade, habitat degradation.


The researchers found that domesticated mammals—including livestock like cows and pigs as well as pets like cats and dogs—host the highest number of viruses that can be shared with people. In fact, these domestic species carry eight times more of these viruses than wild mammal species. Wild animals that have adapted well to human civilization and most often live in urban centers, such as rodents, bats, and primates, also often carried zoonotic diseases.

The study also found that among threatened and endangered species, zoonotic viruses were far more common among those whose habitats human had directly destroyed or degraded. Wildlife whose populations declined due to hunting, trade, and human occupation were more than twice as likely to carry zoonotic viruses compared to those threatened for other reasons, such as the changing climate.


That in turn increased the likelihood of spillover into humans. That’s troubling, because species with declining populations are also more likely to be directly monitored by humans trying to bring about their population recovery, which also puts them into greater contact with people.

“The study by Christine Kreuder Johnson and colleagues highlights the importance of rethinking our relationship with wild animals and wild places and most importantly the contact areas between them,” Christian Walzer, executive director of the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Wildlife Health Programs, told Earther. “The study provides new evidence on how the conservation of wild species and their respective environments can create global health wins and support the mitigation of future epidemics and pandemics.”


Update, April 10, 12:25p.m.: A previous version of this story stated that four tigers at the Bronx zoo had tested positive for covid-19. While multiple tigers are reportedly exhibiting symptoms, only one has tested positive for the virus.

Earther staff writer. Blogs about energy, animals, why we shouldn't trust the private sector to solve the climate crisis, etc. Has an essay in the 2021 book The World We Need.


Times up, time to leave!

Well I’m pretty sure everyone would have been social distancing AT LEAST the mandatory 6 feet with these guys.

What it also calls into question yet again is that since its pretty obvious physical contact isn’t the transmission method, was this an aerosol transmission? Airborne, aerosol differs from droplet transmission in that you quite literally only need to breath on them to transfer the virus. A lot of places are still working on the rash assumption that it isn’t able to be transferred like this simply because no study has proven it yet. But more and more anecdotal evidence is indicating it most definitely is.