Jobs is a bad movie about a sociopath and his obsessions

Jobs is a bad movie about a sociopath and his obsessions

Gizmodo's Kyle Wagner nails the first Jobs biopic as a bad montage of short clips that shows the mighty Apple leader as "a sociopath who systematically ruins his and others' lives, and is rewarded lavishly for it." The only thing that seems good about the movie is Ashton Kutcher (at times) and the supporting cast.

Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak wrote this review in the Kinja comments:

I saw Jobs tonight. I thought the acting throughout was good. I was attentive and entertained but not greatly enough to recommend the movie. One friend who is in the movie said he didn't want to watch fiction so he wasn't interested in seeing it.

I suspect a lot of what was wrong with the film came from Ashton's own image of Jobs. Ashton made some disingenuous and wrong statements about me recently (including my supposedly having said that the 'movie' was bad, which was probably Ashton believing pop press headlines) and that I didn't like the movie because I'm paid to consult on another one. These are examples of Ashton still being in character. Either film would have paid me to consult, but the Jobs one already had a script written. I can't take that creative leadership from someone else. And I was turned off by the Jobs script. But I still hoped for a great movie.

As to compromising principles for money, I will add one detail left out of the film. When Apple decided not to reward early friends who helped, I gave them large blocks of my own stock. Because it was right. And I made it possible for 80 other employees to get some stock prior to the IPO so they could participate in the wealth.

I felt bad for many people I know well who were portrayed wrongly in their interactions with Jobs and the company. The movie ends pretty much where the great Jobs finally found product success (the iPod) and changed so many of our lives. I'm grateful to Steve for his excellence in the i-era, and his contribution to my own life of enjoying great products, but this movie portrays him having had those skills in earlier times.

9
Original post by Kyle Wagner on Gizmodo

Jobs Movie Review: A Sadly Appropriate Metaphor

Jobs Movie Review: A Sadly Appropriate Metaphor

There isn't very much human about Jobs, Ashton Kutcher's Steve Jobs biopic. It's about Steve Jobs working more than it is about Steve Jobs' work. And that's probably about as unintentionally fitting a character portrait as you'll find—just not always an entertaining one.

There are a few arcs that a Steve Jobs biography could track. It could follow Jobs the man, Jobs the CEO, or Jobs the creator. Here, we get the CEO, and basically nothing else. It makes some sense as a narrative instrument—the decisions Jobs made throughout his worklife literally propelled him from one thing to the next, this scene to that. But the screenplay, writer Matt Whiteley's first, takes that to an extreme. It's formulaic in the way 1+1+1+1+1+1=MOVIE is a formula.

The first forty minutes or so of Jobs consist of a series of isolated scenes, one after the other, with no clear ties to each other. There's the scene where we see Jobs taking a calligraphy course; one where we see he doesn't work well with others; another where we find out he and Woz are friends; we learn that Steve is adopted in the first 10 or so awkward seconds of another scene that also has the first of six or seven (or more, depending on your definition) montages or montage-like moments in the film. One scene, one digestible fact, and on to the next point of trivia or godded up, contextless moment.

Around the 40-minute mark, once the movie slows down long enough to have a scene that lasts longer than two minutes, and to introduce a group of characters who interact with each other from one scene to the next, it finds a sweet spot. The scenes with J.K. Simmons as Chairman Arthur Rock and Dermot Mulroney as Mike Markkula (both excellent here, as is Ron Eldard in a smaller role as Rod Holt), when Apple's board of directors begins questioning whether Jobs' talent is worth how massive a pain in the ass he is, are the first time you get a sense that the characters you're watching on screen are actually affecting the outcomes. They build real tension, so that when Steve goes around putting the band back together, even though it's our fifth or so montage of the film, it's the first that feels earned. Even if you've been sitting there like a sourpuss all film, you won't help but cracking a smile while the Macintosh project is coming together.

That these moments of genuine creation are so fleeting is the movie's biggest disappointment. Steve Jobs is fascinating mainly in the context of his work, and how the way he did his job shaped some of the most influential products of the past 50 years. We see a few glimpses of how those came into existence, but not nearly enough. Mostly we make do being shown how unrelentingly dickish Jobs could be. Kutcher squeezes some good moments out of that, and actually adds more realistic vulnerability to Jobs than you'd expect, but can't really do much about the movie stepping on his toes, shoving him off to the next scene.

Oh, and the acting. Surprise! Ashton is actually quite good as Jobs when the movie lets him say anything that doesn't sound like it was written explicitly for the trailer. He really does nail the mannerisms, and wardrobe throughout the film is spot on. An hour in, I realized that I'd stopped seeing Kelso, and just bought into Kutcher as Jobs. And then the script would feed him some soundbyte, on-the-nose line and things would fall back to earth.

That's most noticeable when you realize that even though we see a schism develop between Jobs and his best friend, Woz—played here by Josh Gad who is perfectly likable (despite some historical quibbles from Woz Prime) but clearly not a focus of the film—and Jobs disavow a pregnancy, cold shoulder longtime colleagues, and ultimately wind up a content but restless family man, we never linger long enough, even where a formulaic script might poop out a minute or two of goofball montage in the garage or side-tracked character scenes later, once Apple's incorporated. It's a straight line through, one work crisis after another.

And if that's all it is, you have to ask, why would anyone want to watch that? A cynic might say that this movie is about a sociopath who systematically ruins his and others' lives, and is rewarded lavishly for it. And that's probably fair enough. The unfortunate part here is that while a psychotic dedication to work and nothing but is often a recipe for success in business, it isn't a very fun way for a movie to go about its business.

9 Reply