After Two Years of Nuclear Crises, Japan Opens Its Biggest Solar Park

Illustration for article titled After Two Years of Nuclear Crises, Japan Opens Its Biggest Solar Park

This month, Japanese electronics company Kyocera launched the country's largest solar plant. The facility can power 22,000 homes—and, maybe more importantly, it poses no risk of melting down, injuring workers, or spewing radioactive water into the Pacific ocean.

Kagoshima Nanatsujima Mega Solar Power Plant—the facility's proper name—is located in an inlet at the very southern tip of Japan, which means it's fairly safe from threatening storms or tsunamis—although it does sit in the shadow of Sakurajima, an active volcano. But no matter what crises may come over the next few decades, Nanatsujima poses almost no threat to the surrounding community.

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled After Two Years of Nuclear Crises, Japan Opens Its Biggest Solar Park

The Fukushima disaster isn't the only thing spurring Japan's boom in solar energy production. In fact, the country has instituted a large-scale program to encourage new plants—and more importantly, to encourage consumers to choose solar over more traditional forms of energy.

Illustration for article titled After Two Years of Nuclear Crises, Japan Opens Its Biggest Solar Park

This policy, which began in 2012, is called a "feed-in tariff." In essence, it subsidizes the higher cost of solar power against other sources—supplying solar park owners with payments for their trouble. As the Washington Post explained in June, Japan's solar energy output it expected to double this year thanks to the resulting "explosion" of solar parks:

The feed-in tariff is the legacy of Naoto Kan, Japan's unpopular prime minister at the time of the Fukushima disaster, who decided after the meltdowns that atomic power was too dangerous for this earthquake-prone country. So, Kan made a deal with the opposition party: He'd resign only after parliament cooperated to pass several pieces of legislation, including a renewable-energy bill that established the tariff.

Advertisement

In short, Kan sacrificed his political career in exchange for a deal that would encourage energy companies to go solar. After more than two years, it looks like he was right to do so. [Slate]

Share This Story

Get our `newsletter`

DISCUSSION

joehawkeye
Go Hawkeyes

Not to sound like a tree hugger animal lover but just because it doesn't pose a risk (that we know of) to people doesn't mean it's safe for the environment as well. The best answer is to reduce dependency of electricity. Not find marginally better ways to generate it.