Cox Might Slow Down a Whole Neighborhood's Internet If One Person Is Using Too Much Data

Illustration for article titled Cox Might Slow Down a Whole Neighborhoods Internet If One Person Is Using Too Much Data
Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP (Getty Images)

If there is anything as quite as infuriating as internet data caps, having your internet speed throttled is up there—especially if you pay extra to have ultra-fast, uncapped internet. According to Ars Technica, Cox Communications not only wants certain customers to stop using so much data, it’s also reportedly punishing entire neighborhoods to get those customers to stop using so much data.

Advertisement

Cox gigabit-internet subscriber Mike from Gainesville, Florida, pays $150 a month for unlimited data with 1Gbps download speeds and 35Mbps upload speeds. Mike told Ars he started receiving notices from Cox in May 2020, warning him that his upload data usage was “extraordinarily high,” and if he did not make any reductions, his account would be terminated.

However, Cox’s Acceptable Use Policy doesn’t explicitly specify how much data use it considers to be extraordinarily high, especially for someone who pays an extra $50 a month specifically to get rid of their data cap.

Advertisement

According to Ars, Mike said he only uses that much data between the hours of 1 a.m. to 8 a.m., at a time when internet traffic is at its lowest, as part of his job, which requires scheduled device backups and sharing data across various encrypted channels. He also noted that he has used between 8TB and 12TB of data on the same plan for the last four years, but his data traffic during regular hours is in line with what most people would typically use.

“Cox should have been upgrading their infrastructure instead of oversubscribing nodes and pocketing the record revenue,” Mike told Ars.

As Ars points out, a large broadband network like Cox’s should be able to handle that kind of upload traffic, especially in the early morning hours, and at just 35Mbps. But according to one email Mike received from Cox, his broadband usage was “causing a negative impact” on Cox’s network and its other customers in his area.

Cox also reportedly told Mike that the company was dropping its upload speed from 35Mbps to 10Mbps—for his entire neighborhood—until July 15. Gizmodo reached out to Cox to clarify if this was solely a result of Mike’s internet usage, and if customers would see lower monthly bills as a result, but Cox has not yet responded to Gizmodo’s request for comment.

Advertisement

However, Cox did confirm to Ars that it has been lowering upload speeds—from its usual 35Mbps on the gigabit-download plan to 10Mbps—in certain neighborhoods where it believed “performance can be improved for all customers in the neighborhood by temporarily increasing or maintaining download speeds and changing upload speeds for some of our service tiers.” It considers 10Mbps to be “plenty of speed for the vast majority of customers.” (For illustration, if you were trying to upload a 50GB file, it would take just over 12 hours at 10Mbps.) It also said that users like Mike “are causing congestion problems in a small number of neighborhoods by utilizing over 100-200 times more upstream bandwidth than the average household.”

Some Reddit users are reportedly experiencing the same thing, seeing their traffic throttled traffic or receiving similar requests to lower their internet usage. Cox was one of several companies who pledged not to terminate internet plans until June 30 due to the covid-19 pandemic. It also said it would waive late fees. But the company did not mention anything about waiving data cap overage fees.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Email the reporter at jnelius@gizmodo.com or via Proton Mail. DM for Signal. 

Staff Reporter, Reviews at Gizmodo. Formerly PC Gamer, Maximum PC.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

waywardapology
Wayward Apology

I mean fuck Cox but also:

“According to Ars, Mike said he only uses that much data between the hours of 1 a.m. to 8 a.m., at a time when internet traffic is at its lowest, as part of his job, which requires scheduled device backups and sharing data across various encrypted channels.”

Cox will not install that type of service in a business at that cost so maybe don’t run a server farm from your home internet? Like there has to be some line between my personal business use from home involves a lot of video and I’ve rented I’m running a enterprise data center from my basement. And also reasonable options not to do so, I feel like Cox would probably be fine if he was using his home internet to VNC to a co-hosted data center to do his work.