Google's Eric Schmidt Is Scared of Siri

Illustration for article titled Googles Eric Schmidt Is Scared of Siri

Maybe it's just a bit of false modesty, but chairman Eric Schmidt told a Senate subcommittee recently that he believes Apple's Siri technology poses a threat to Google in the search market.

Advertisement

NeoWin first unearthed Schmidt's statements on Siri, which were taken from a response to questions originally posed during a Senate subcommittee hearing earlier this fall. The most interesting bit is Schmidt's willingness to admit they had overestimated the technology.

As I noted this past June, my statement last September was clearly wrong. The Internet is dynamic and has changed significantly. The importance of social networking to consumers' online experience has changed remarkably-even over the past year. Consumers are looking for answers when they conduct searches online, and social search has become a serious competitor in helping people find those answers online. Similarly, Apple's Siri is a significant development-a voice-activated means of accessing answers through iPhones that demonstrates the innovations in search. The tech industry is one of the most competitive and dynamic spaces in the entire economy, with small companies as well as larger companies competing hard
against each other in lots of areas. Google has many strong competitors and we sometimes fail to anticipate
the competitive threat posed by new methods of accessing information. We compete against a broader array
of companies than most people realize, including general search engines.

Advertisement

But like AppleInsider points out, one must take this with a grain of salt. Schmidt was responding to questions posed during an antitrust hearing, and in addition to playing up the viability of Siri as a search engine, he also skewed statistics to make it sound like the iPhone had a higher marketshare than Android handsets. But maybe he isn't. Are the search capabilities of Siri, who can interpret conversational speech, a glimpse at the future of the technology? [Google via NeoWin via AppleInsider]

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

petervista-old
peter_vista

The crimes Eric Schmidt involved into, including killing the innocent (Stanford Student May Zhou) and conspiring life of the victim (me), is fascism by nature; and such crimes would not be excused by any other reasons (e.g. for business reasons); and such crimes would not be tolerated anywhere, let alone in a civilized country as U.S. Their crimes had extended to U.S. citizen (e.g. May Zhou) and against U.S. authorities, and their crimes are surely far more than what I have described on the web, which I believe had already been well documented at judicial authorities. If their crimes could not be clarified to the public and concurred at authorities, it would be a serious offending to the dignity of the nation of the United States.

Fighting against these powerful criminals is a tough task, because anywhere this case is going, there are powers on these criminals' side to cover them up while conspiring the victim. The consequences of what Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun already had done are irreparable and unforgivable. And I don’t think Schmidt and Thrun’s side would ever regret of what they did. In my opinion, Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun would have to face legal consequences and pay for their crimes sooner or later. Until these crimes clarified to the public and concurred at authorities, Eric Schmidt, Sebastian Thrun and power behind them would remain a menace to human soceity.