Jack Dorsey Wants You to Know He Was Right About 280-Character Tweets

Photo: Getty
Photo: Getty

When Twitter announced last November it was finally doubling the 140-character limit of tweets, after months of speculation and handwringing, some vocal users tweeted out their snark and certainty that this development was a death knell for the medium. 


Twitter assured users at the time that there was no need for alarm. The company had been experimenting with the new length for a couple months, Twitter said in November. It had apparently learned that, at first, “many people Tweeted the full 280 limit because it was new and novel, but soon after behavior normalized.” Twitter argued the change would not make a significant negative impact, but would only allow people to tweet more freely in the rare moments when they needed more than 140 characters.

Alas, many users still had their doubts that such a change was necessary or beneficial.

Now, Twitter wants to assure the world—or at least its shareholders—that it was right. The Verge reports that during a call this morning with investors, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said the only thing that has changed since the character increase is that Twitter now has more engagement.

“One of the things we were watching for is to see if the if the average tweet size would go up as a result, and it has not,” Dorsey said on the call. “People do have the room—we’re seeing less abandonment of tweets. But we’re also seeing a lot more engagement. We’re also seeing more retweets, and we’re seeing a lot more mentions. And we’re also seeing people get more followers and return more often.”

While the Twitter experience for most users apparently hasn’t changed much since, it does seem like the average tweet size would have had to increase at least a little after doubling the character count.


Twitter did not respond to a Gizmodo request for comment or provide more specific details on the average tweet size now compared to before the character limit change. When the Verge asked Twitter for clarification on Dorsey’s statement, the company referred the outlet to the original blog post from November which referred only to trial testing.

Regardless, Dorsey appears to have proven himself right in some regard. The change didn’t have an overtly negative effect. And the company also announced today that last quarter it made a profit for the first time ever. For better or worse, Twitter is isn’t dying off in the immediate future.


[The Verge]

Former senior reporter at Gizmodo



I have a hard time seeing how some of these social networks think they’re going to compete long term. Snapchat’s distinguishing feature was self destructing dick pics. Twitter’s distinguishing feature was the ability to not need a dataplan or smartphone. Remember when Twitter was a cool SMS hack to deliver a social network over unlimited SMS plans before everyone had data?  

Facebook destroyed MySpace because it offered everything MySpace had but with unlimited photos (HUGE feature) and no dancing glitter bear gifs while 30 songs blared in the background. What Facebook users hate most about Facebook is how much they end up using it. Good luck building a competitive product around “I don’t feel compelled to use it very often”.