Various fakes of Donald Trump being arrested in various positions circulated widely after news broke of the former president’s expected indictment.

Advertisement

Elsewhere, you may have come across such images as Russian President Vladimir Putin facing a Hague tribunal, or maybe John F. Kennedy aiming a rifle out of a window. All of these images were created using Midjourney, one of the most popular, publicly available AI’s.

Advertisement

Yet the images aren’t reason enough to restrict or shut down Midjourney access, Holz implied. Instead, the company claims its current prohibition on free trials is a form of profit protection. It wants users to move from the free trial to a paid subscription, not another free trial.

Holz further implied that the most recent suite of problematic, political images are the product of Midjourney v5—which has only been made available to paying users, anyway. When they were open, free trial sign-ups limited users to the 5-month old v4, Holz said.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, the CEO still said that Midjourney is working on improved moderation. “I think we’re still trying to figure out what the right moderation policies are. We are taking feedback from experts and the community and trying to be really thoughtful. We already have some new systems coming which should ship soon,” he wrote.

The company’s so-far limited efforts to halt the rise of entertaining, yet potentially dangerous and deceptive, false images demonstrate the murky issues of AI-regulation we’ve waded into. How will generative AI software developers balance the pressure for access, “free speech,” and making a product people actually want to use with social responsibility and the risk for glaring misuse? And will any U.S. agencies step in?

Advertisement

For now, the answers remain unclear, to everyone—tech CEOs included.

Compared with some of its peers like OpenAI’s DALL-E, which has policies barring users from creating any sexual or violent content and including real political figures, Midjourney’s standards are much more permissive. Yet compared with Stable Diffusion, where users can download an open-source software and effectively do whatever they like, Midjourney has more guardrails.

Advertisement

You can’t, for instance, use Midjourney to generate images of China’s president Xi Jinping, though other world leaders remain fair game. Holz explained this decision with a Discord post last year. “Political satire in [China] is pretty not-okay,” the CEO wrote, per the Washington Post. “The ability for people in China to use this tech is more important than your ability to generate satire,” he added.

And the company recently added the term “arrested” to its list of banned prompt phrases, according to The Verge, likely in response to those aforementioned Trump images.

Advertisement

But still, navigating the vast and nebulous center of what should and shouldn’t be allowed on the internet is clearly proving difficult for Holz. On Wednesday, during a live Discord session, the exec told an audience of thousands that he was having a hard time zeroing in on content rules—particularly surrounding the use of real peoples’ images, according to WaPo. “There’s an argument to go full Disney or go full Wild West, and everything in the middle is kind of painful,” the CEO reportedly said. “We’re kind of in the middle right now, and I don’t know how to feel about it.”

The moratorium on free Midjourney access doesn’t solve the issue. And, again, the CEO claims the decision to stop free trials isn’t the result of deepfake dissemination at all. But maybe, perhaps, it might slow the problem down by limiting the number of people who can produce scary-real, fake pictures of nearly whatever they want. For $10, $30, or $60 per month, anyone willing to pay up can still opt for content chaos.

Advertisement

Want to know more about AI, chatbots, and the future of machine learning? Check out our full coverage of artificial intelligence, or browse our guides to The Best Free AI Art Generators and Everything We Know About OpenAI’s ChatGPT.