Robot Journalist Accidentally Reports on Earthquake from 1925

File photo of damage from an earthquake in Napa in 2014  (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
File photo of damage from an earthquake in Napa in 2014 (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Yesterday, the Los Angeles Times reported on a 6.8 earthquake that struck Santa Barbara at 4:51pm. Which might be surprising to the people of Santa Barbara who didn’t feel anything. The big problem with the story? The earthquake happened in 1925.


How could reporters get something so wrong? Well, the “reporter” who wrote yesterday’s news article about the 6.8 quake was actually a robot. The L.A. Times deleted its automated tweet as well as the automatically published article and explained what happened in a subsequent tweet:

The newspaper’s algorithm, called Quakebot, scrapes data from the US Geological Survey’s website. A USGS staffer at Caltech mistakenly sent out the alert when updating historical earthquake data to make it more precise.

Seismologists have reportedly complained about some of the historical data being off by as much as 6 miles, and this staffer was simply updating the location of the old quake from 1925. But it shows how quickly misinformation can spread with just a few clicks.

An earthquake registering 6.8 is a big deal, so people were pretty relieved to see that it was a false alarm. The 1925 earthquake killed 13 people and caused over $8 million in damage. With so many more people living in the area today it would no doubt be much more deadly.


The Los Angeles Times has employed Quakebot since 2014 and has reported on hundreds of earthquakes, big and small, over the years. But this is the first known major screw up since it was first put online. And it certainly won’t be the last as journalism on everything from homicides to baseball scores becomes more automated.

Quakebot could not be reached for comment by press time.

[Los Angeles Times]


Matt Novak is the editor of Gizmodo's Paleofuture blog



Thanks for this article. It is very illustrative of the issues surrounding automation in our lives today. In a way, it wasn’t Quakebots fault because the faulty alert was put out due to human error by the geological society. But on the other hand, a human reporter would have caught the error before publication for obvious reasons (they would have noticed the ground wasn’t shaking).