The justices heard arguments to determine whether or not the recommendation of ISIS-related content on Twitter amounted to aiding and abetting terrorists.
How we all secretly like the silencing we claim to hate.
During oral arguments of a crucial online speech case, Google v. Gonzalez, Supreme Court justices roasted themselves and said Congress may be more tech-savvy.
The court will determine if the same protections apply to social networks' algorithmic recommendations as to individuals' posts.
Attorneys for the Wikimedia Foundation said even linking to another page could be an issue, depending on how the Supreme Court rules on Gonzalez v. Google.
The highest court in the U.S. will review a case that could completely change how the internet operates.
TikTok may face a ban in the EU if it doesn't regulate its online content by September of this year.
The tech giant argued that algorithms are the only possible way companies can possibly handle the mass number of online users.
A divided Congress will spar over perceived tech censorship, while SCOTUS hears cases threatening to fundamentally alter bedrock internet protections.
The bill excludes electronics for enterprise and lets OEMs give consumers “assemblies of parts,” rather than single, specific components needed for a repair.
The agency cited timeline concerns, and announced it would push back implementation of new tax requirements for businesses that rely on digital payments.
Some state colleges and universities are restricting access to TikTok on campus following executive orders passed by local government officials.
A parody account was suspended after posting a Zuckerberg deepfake, despite Zuckerberg advocating in favor of the same video publicly.
Advocacy group Demand Progress Action released a video ad featuring a realistic Meta CEO to get Sen. Chuck Schumer and more to pass antitrust legislation.
The regulator hinted at an eagerness to rein in content that blurs the lines between ads and entertainment.
Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and more all depend on being shielded from responsibility for user content via Section 230, but that could soon change.
Sen. Ron Wyden urged inspectors general at three departments to investigate the military's purchases of large swaths of data.
Court judges wrote that Nazis and terrorists using online platforms to spread hate was ‘hypothetical' and compared content moderation to checking the mail.
How does Biden want to change Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act? It's unclear — and maybe that's fine.
The European Commission allegedly transferred data to Amazon servers in the U.S. two years after it outlawed that exact practice.
