This Must Be the Dumbest Cycle Helmet Design Ever

Illustration for article titled This Must Be the Dumbest Cycle Helmet Design Ever

This helmet may just be a concept, but it aims to bring technology to the world of cycling headwear. It is also ridiculous.

Advertisement

While it may look like it was created as part of an elaborate joke, apparently Toby King's "Smart Hat" is being taken (vaguely) seriously. The Sydney-based designer is said to have presented the helmet at a local city council as a concept for licensing cyclists—and councillor called Simon Menzies reportedly approves.

The helmet supposedly integrates "modern, electronic safety devices." Replete with "bluetooth, a display with speaker, full satnav, speedometer, speed zones, temperature, heart rate, tilt sensor, ultrasonic object proximity warning, turn signal indicators..." the idea sure is ambitious. And it looks so... odd.

Advertisement

It also has cyclists in somewhat of a spin, especially the part on the website that explains: "Apart from safety considerations, it is desirable to be able to identify cyclists to make them accountable for their behavior in a similar way to drivers of motor vehicles." Hence the license plate on the back of the helmet.

Typically not fans of being told they'd need to be registered on the road—"Pedestrians use the road. DO THE PEDESTRIANS PAY FOR REGISTRATION?" (something I agree with, for what it's worth)—it is, indeed, hard to see how a helmet alone will suddenly change road law relating to cycling around the world. Chances are, it won't. Chances are, this will remain a concept. I sure hope so. [Smart Hat]

Illustration for article titled This Must Be the Dumbest Cycle Helmet Design Ever
Illustration for article titled This Must Be the Dumbest Cycle Helmet Design Ever
Advertisement

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Wait, so a cyclist is expected to follow the same traffic laws as an automobile. But heaven forbid they be registered and have a tag, LIKE AN AUTOMOBILE. Even as a bike rider myself, I find that bit hypocritical. Didn't the same argument come up with motorcycles in the past? We share the road, so there's nothing wrong with this. Pedestrians only share the crosswalks.

That helmet is fugly though.