Millions of Climate Refugees Have Already Lost Their Homes

Illustration for article titled Millions of Climate Refugees Have Already Lost Their Homes

When your town is continually threatened by floods or your village’s fields become too dry to grow crops, there are two options: move on, or stick around and try to make things work. At the Paris climate talks, there’s a swell of opinion to encourage the latter.

In a session at the Conference of Parties in Paris today, Marine Franck from the UN’s Advisory Group on Climate Change and Human Mobility said that, on average, 22.5 million people have been displaced each year between 2008 and 2014 as a result of sudden-onset weather-related hazards—floods, cyclones, earthquakes and the like. The number that have moved because of slower-onset problems, such as drought, remains poorly understood, but is also likely to be significant.

Communities may choose to stay put in the face of such changes, and must adapt to their new situation, by building storm resistant housing, say, or buying seed for drought resistant crops. But adaptation costs money, and many countries most threatened by climate change, such as Bangladesh, Haiti, or the Pacific island nations, are also some of the poorest.

Advertisement

The other option is to move. That may often be within the same country—heading further inland from a flood, or to a nearby town that avoided a hurricane’s path. But flooding and drought have already forced African citizens to cross borders, while landslides and earthquakes have pushed South Americans from one country to another.

The outlook is often bleak for migrants. The 1951 Refugee Convention, which defines the rights of those who move and the obligations of the states involved, only accounts for those that flee conflict or persecution, not the effects of climate change.

The choice is tough: huge expense on the one hand, and a potentially brutal struggle for the displaced on the other. The Prime Minister of the Cook Islands—one of the Pacific island nations at the front line in terms of threats from climate —put it starkly: “Can you put a dollar value on birthright, on nationhood?” he asked. “I suggest not.”

There’s already a move to help, in the shape of the Nansen Initiative. First launched in October 2012 and that was finally endorsed by governments around the world this October, the scheme is designed to protect displaced people “in the context of disasters and climate change.”

Advertisement

And now there’s a call to integrate these issues into the agreements that are made in Paris over the next few days. In recommendations made by the Advisory Group on Climate Change and Human Mobility earlier today, Franck said that “preventing and minimizing displacement must be a priority” for any agreements.

Franck added that in cases where preventing displacement was impossible, people should be able to “migrate in dignity when crisis comes knocking at their door”—that is, they should be able to live a productive life in their new home.

Advertisement

There should be educational prospects and training available to keep them independent, so they’re not reliant on the help of others. And when entire settlements need to be abandoned, there must be “careful planning with communities to move them to new homes in safer areas.”

But how do you discern a refugee of true climate change from one uprooted by a freak weather event? That’s something for politicians and climate scientists to wrangle over in the coming days.

Advertisement

We can be certain of this: the agreements made this week int Paris should do more than simply nod to the plight and future prospects of the displaced.

Image by AP

Advertisement

Share This Story

Get our `newsletter`

DISCUSSION

Climate change doesn’t happen over night. These people have decades to figure it out. Here is an idea. Why don’t the liberals stop blaming the worlds problems on private industry and focus their energy on educating these people on the natural cycles of the planet. Liberals give these low information human beings hope that the rest of mankind, namely America, can actually help them stop the sea level from rising or help them bring rain to their desert. We can not control the weather. We can not control the climate. Hell, we can’t even predict the weather forecast more than a few hours out. Sell your stuff, sell a pint of blood, and buy a ticket out of there. No need for mass exudes. Pack your shit and leave. Jeez, some people are so dumb that they the need government(s) to tell them to move from out of a desert or a coastal flood plane.