Authors Guild Claims Kindle 2 Text-to-Speech Somehow Violates Copyright

Illustration for article titled Authors Guild Claims Kindle 2 Text-to-Speech Somehow Violates Copyright

The notoriously litigious ink-lovers at the Writers Guild are mad at Amazon againthis time for the Kindle 2's text-to-speech feature. Apparently, Amazon is effectively stealing and giving away audiobooks, or something.


The Guild claim, as printed in the WSJ:

They don't have the right to read a book out loud," said Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild. "That's an audio right, which is derivative under copyright law."

As Rob at BBG points out, the idea that a robotic reading of text is materially equivalent to a proper, recorded audio version of a book—read by the author in many cases—is ridiculous. It's possible that the Writers Guild folks are so whimsical as to think that every Kindle 2 download contains a tiny, kidnapped authorial homunculus that needs to be saved, but I think their perception of the device is what sparked this whole thing.

Still, the issue is more clear now than it will be in a few years. If text-to-speech synthesis improves much more, it could be mostly indistinguishable from a human reading, the widespread use such technology could render audiobooks all but pointless. Looking ahead to this time, we have two different perpectives: that dedicated audiobooks should gracefully pass into obsolescence, or that audiobooks deserve to exist, and that anything threatening their sales must be illegal.

Ultimately, the scenario in first perspective will probably come to pass, with or without the "graceful" part. [WSJ via BBG]



Having a book converted from text to speech for my own personal use would clearly be covered under fair use. If I can legally make a photocopy of a book for my own personal use, I can have the text converted to speech for personal use. This is just another obvious attempt to cripple fair use.