Boeing Never Fully Tested the Design of the Dreamliner Battery That Caught Fire (Update)

Illustration for article titled Boeing Never Fully Tested the Design of the Dreamliner Battery That Caught Fire (Update)

Two months after Boeing's new 787 Dreamliner was grounded, investigators are still trying to figure out what caused a battery on one of the planes to catch fire. Apex reports that the latest information indicates the battery was never fully tested.

Boeing didn't develop the battery on its own. Much of the work was subcontracted out to the firms Thales and Securaplane. The interim report from the Airworthiness investigation team found that while the companies each performed thousands of hours of testing on the battery system's components, none of the companies could produce proof that they'd performed "complete life-cycle tests" on the entire assembled battery system. In other words, nobody put the whole the whole thing together and tried to make it fail.

Advertisement

That alone would be sloppy, but it's even worse because we're talking about an entirely new type of battery technology that the FAA was worried about. The Dreamliner is the first airplane to use a lithium-ion rechargeable battery. The FAA did a study and concluded that this probably wasn't a good idea to begin with. According to the System Safety and Certification team's report:

The FAA noted that other users of this technology, ranging from wireless telephone manufacturing to the electric vehicle industry, have noted safety problems with lithium-ion batteries, which included overcharging, over-discharging, and flammability of cell components.

Advertisement

Lithium-ion batteries are the same type used in smartphones, which as we know, frequently fail and sometimes even blow up. Boeing installed this risky design change into the Dreamliner without adequate testing. As the author of the APEX story points out on her blog, the safety and certification report has "a blizzard of documents, calculations, schematics and diagrams from Boeing" that would make you think that the tests were complete. The NTSB investigation isn't done, but it's looking more and more like Boeing did a shoddy job and the FAA rubber stamped it.

Advertisement

We reached out to Boeing for comment and we'll update when they respond. [NTSB via APEX]

Update:We contacted Boeing for comment on the NTSB report and a spokesperson told us:

Release of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) interim report is a positive step in the progress toward completing the investigation of the Jan. 7 event in Boston. The Boeing team has worked tirelessly in support of the NTSB to help develop an understanding of the event and will continue to do so.

The 787 was certified following a rigorous Boeing test program and an extensive certification program conducted by the FAA. We provided testing and analysis in support of the requirements of the FAA special conditions associated with the use of lithium ion batteries. We are working collaboratively to address questions about our testing and compliance with certification standards, and we will not hesitate to make changes that lead to improved testing processes and products.

Advertisement

Share This Story

Get our `newsletter`

DISCUSSION

CaptainObvious7
CaptainObvious7

Lithium-ion batteries "frequently" fail?

There are billions of phones and millions of laptops. Yet, if a battery fire happens it there is usually a clickwhoringly panicky Gizmodo article. How often does that happen? Maybe several times a year? Out of billions of batteries. How is that frequent?

Having said that, Lithium Ion batteries have higher energy density than older technologies so they are more susceptible to fires etc. So there should be much stricter quality control and better design for charging/discharging systems around such battery, especially for aeronautic applications. But since weight is a very important factor on an airplane, I am betting that Lithium Ion batteries are there to stay and Li-Po will be next (even though they are even more unstable).