I Don't Like LHC Scientist's Quotes That Start With "If It Does Destroy the World..."

Illustration for article titled I Don't Like LHC Scientist's Quotes That Start With "If It Does Destroy the World..."

It's good to know that quotes like this—by Dr Paul Jackson, a particle physicist looking for the Higgs boson on the LHC Atlas experiment—come with a context:

For me, it's nonsense to say that there are forces coming back from the future to stop the machine from working. It really is just ridiculous to think that is the case. If people could travel forward or back in time, why wouldn't they have done something better or worse for humanity than coming and twiddling around with the LHC?

If it does destroy the world, there's no-one in the future to travel back in time to do anything about it. It's all a bit Back to the Future really. It's part of this whole mystery about the machine — people are willing to believe anything. Physicists sometimes shoot themselves in the foot by not saying, 'We won't destroy the world with black holes,' because they work on probability. Saying, 'This won't happen,' is just not ingrained into them.


Good. But that doesn't explain this. Or the fact that an LHC scientist confused Star Trek with Star Wars. That last thing, my dear friends, is what really has me worried. [Crave UK]


One of the key problems inherent in this problem is that the LHC is trying to re-define physics and that as Einstein pointed out our understanding of physics only applies to us(as we are pre-light beings, ie beings/particles that can exist at the speed of light would not be bound by our knowledge of physics).

So basically...a temporal causality loop could cause the LHC to destroy our world and create our past...the only problem is that that is a theoretical paradox(in human standards, not in higher beings/universal standards)

....that being said, the way LOST tackled whatever happened happened bothered me for this same principle.