Europe Says Net Banning Is a Violation of "Civil Liberties and Human Rights"

Illustration for article titled Europe Says Net Banning Is a Violation of "Civil Liberties and Human Rights"

The European Parliament voted on anti-piracy bill that would boot persistent "file-sharers" off of the net, at the last minute shooting down that particular measure. More importantly, it added an amendment that said the European Union and its member countries should "avoid adopting measures conflicting with civil liberties and human rights and with the principles of proportionality, effectiveness and dissuasiveness, such as the interruption of internet access." The vote royally pissed off the EU's RIAA-equivalent, the IFPI. Even still, the vote itself may not result in any kind of safe haven for, uh, P2P "enthusiasts":

Though the European Parliament has plenty of power, this particular legislation seems to be more for advisory purposes. The BBC says:

The vote has no legal force and leaves national governments free to implement their own anti-piracy plans. But, said the Open Rights Group, it does "signify resistance" among European law makers to the strict measures that nations such as France are implementing.


Regardless of the outcome, it's a tickling notion. I mean, you know you're squarely in the Information Age when interruption of net access constitutes a conflict of human rights. [BBC News]


People are too comfortable to revolt to a revolution. A Youtube post of yourself talking in front of a wall does not constitute a revolution. Revolutions are nasty bits of history with blood, death, and famines. Once the local Cosco gets shut down then people get uncomfortable and want to stop the revolution.

So unfortunately we need to wait for the zombie attacking revolution. Bring 'em on!

- T