Lawsuit Alleges University of Pittsburgh Covered Up Escaped Lab Monkey Infected With 'Select Agent'

Illustration for article titled Lawsuit Alleges University of Pittsburgh Covered Up Escaped Lab Monkey Infected With 'Select Agent'

A former immunology expert and laboratory director at the University of Pittsburgh alleges she was fired after blowing the whistle on safety violations at the university, including an incident when a laboratory monkey infected with a “select agent” escaped its cage, the Penn Record reported.


According to the Record, court documents show former university immunology professor and Regional Biocontainment Laboratory associate director Kelly Stefano Cole filed a lawsuit accusing university personnel of violating the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law by terminating her after she reported the escaped lab monkey to them:

Cole’s suit says she questioned the university’s Biological Safety Officer, Dr. Molly Stitt-Fischer, about the incident and its outcome. Stitt-Fischer told Cole the event was not a safety violation, but an “accident,” the suit says. As it was deemed such, [the person allegedly responsible for the accident] would not lose her access to the facility, the suit says.

As Stitt-Fischer’s account differed from what the student initially told her, Cole took it upon herself to review the university’s report of the incident and found what she called a “notable error” in the report – namely, that the infected laboratory monkey had only escaped its cage for a short time, when it had actually escaped for several hours, the suit says.

Cole alleges she was told not to report the incident to federal authorities, and that she later learned a second incident involving a laboratory rabbit yet again infected with a “select agent” had similarly gone unreported. According to the Record, she also says the university subsequently began hitting her with minor infractions of rules like “improper sign-in procedures for the laboratories, improper laboratory attire and a paperwork discrepancy connected to various shipments of vials,” violations her colleagues were allegedly equally guilty of but not disciplined for, until she was eventually fired.

A select agent refers to varieties of biological agents that the Department of Health and Human Services or the United States Department of Agriculture believe could potentially “pose a severe threat to public health and safety”—a list that includes some pretty heavy hitters like hemorrhagic fevers and the plague, as well as diseases that can devastate livestock or plants.

In other words, all of it’s pretty bad stuff, though the Penn Record report doesn’t shed any light on exactly which agent it was or the circumstances of the supposed lab breakouts. Before you start buying face masks and stockpiling canned food, there’s also the possibility there’s more to this story than let on by one side of the lawsuit.

In 2017, federal authorities completed a review of the University of Pittsburgh’s laboratory facilities after People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals alleged widespread abuse of animals housed there, per the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service investigators deemed the accusations unfounded.


Gizmodo has reached out to the University of Pittsburgh for comment, and we’ll update this post if we hear back.

[Penn Record]


"... An upperclassman who had been researching terrorist groups online." - Washington Post



Just FYI, even if a lab monkey escapes its cage, that probably just means it can roam about the cage room, which is probably secured by a combination lock and maybe also a swipe card.

I used to work in a lab that used monkeys. (I was just a computer guy.) There was apparently one incident before I got there where a monkey got out of its cage, but it pretty much just bopped around the room and taunted the other monkeys. The vet techs went in and were able to get it under control.

Monkeys were transferred directly from their cages to a “chair” which was a clear plastic box with a place to sit and a hole for the monkey’s head to poke out the top. Only then was the monkey, in his chair, transported out of the cage room and into areas where it could conceivably access uncontrolled people spaces. So in our case there wasn’t much chance of a monkey getting loose among people.

I’m guessing these practices are more or less standard, possibly required by regulations.

Obviously, a monkey getting loose in a lab at all is sub-optimal, but it probably isn’t that big of a deal.

Especially if the “select agent” the plaintiff is talking about is herpes B, which is endemic in rhesus monkeys and fatal in humans, but doesn’t stop millions of tourists from engaging with them. It was a USDA select agent until 2012, when it was one of a number that were removed from the list.

“ People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals alleged widespread abuse of animals housed there”

I’m guessing they’d allege that of any lab using animals for research unless that research was into “who’s a good boy?”