Everysight's Maverick AI Pro smart glasses are trying to take one of the Vision Pro's best features, but it ain't that simple.
Or maybe plant recognition? How about plant recognition?
If camera-equipped smart glasses aren't your thing, you're about to have a new pair at your disposal.
In a video from March, Meta's CTO, Andrew Bosworth, says Ray-Ban users are "choosing" to have some of their content reviewed.
Whoop, there it is. And by "it" we mean another lawsuit.
Whether people want to give Meta all their food data is another question entirely.
Potential plans to add facial recognition to Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses aren't very popular it seems.
Even with an eye-catching design, privacy concerns over smart glasses could make them DOA.
New models have prescriptions in mind for people who actually still need help seeing.
In China, there's a growing market for renting smart glasses to help you cheat on your tests.
They say eyes are windows to the soul. Well, they're also the windows to more windows, too.
I wouldn’t plan on wearing smart glasses to court anytime soon.
Privacy be damned.
A European rollout is also hitting blockades thanks to the smart glasses' battery and use of AI.
The Inmo Go 3 has a camera cover that speaks volumes about smart glasses right now.
Turns out you're not the only one who thinks adding facial recognition to smart glasses is a bad idea.
A UK judge determined that a witness was being fed answers through his smart glasses during cross-examination.
With Meta fumbling the bag on privacy, Samsung's "Galaxy Glasses" might be appealing by default.
It's getting to the point of state-level legislation.
Maybe using people's naked videos to train AI wasn't such a good idea after all.
