Everyone knows what you post online is never truly gone, but rarely are attempts to scrub something from the web quite this ironic—or infuriating.
Last week, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers History Center tweeted out an apology to author Safiya Umoja Noble after one of its historians shared a glaringly insulting criticism of her work from the organization’s Twitter account. But it appears the IEEE History Center—which was established to help preserve information on electrical technologies—has since deleted the apology.
Noble, a professor, author, and co-founder of the Information Ethics & Equity Institute, just published her book Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, which argues that search engine algorithms are not free from bias and discriminate against people of color. Alexander Magoun, an outreach historian at the IEEE History Center, attempted to discredit Noble’s findings by tweeting the following from the organization’s account, according to Inside Higher Ed:
“These @Google searches for <black girls> https://t.co/xQdQWoVTZy & <white girls> https://t.co/dEOp7CzKNw don’t quite match thesis; Images for <white girls> arguably far worse @histoftech @STS_News @SIGCIS”
To decode this tweet: Magoun was attempting to discredit Noble’s argument that algorithms are biased—specifically, biased in favor of white people—by pointing to a pair of search results cited in Noble’s book. (It’s the portion that appears on the book’s Amazon page.) It effectively boils down an important conversation to some cursory Googling in a flawed manner while also weakly dismissing the work of an expert in the field. And he apparently did it without reading the book.
That tweet has been deleted, and IEEE told Inside Higher Ed that it was “an unauthorized use of an IEEE account” and “is being addressed internally.” IEEE History Center later said in a tweet that the apology was also unauthorized.
Magoun later apologized through the @IEEEhistory account, where he posted a two-tweet apology addressed to Noble, who responded by saying she had accepted the apology.
In an email to Gizmodo, Noble called the dustup with Magoun “an unfortunate situation.” She added:
“It symbolizes how research by scholars who are women of color is often dismissed, and how little recourse we have. The controversy was sparked by @IEEEHist, and now IEEE has attempted to erase all traces of it, leaving it to appear as if there was never an aggression in the first place.
“Unfortunately, digital media platforms—from Google to Twitter or Facebook—work as a de facto record of human activities. The thesis of the book takes up these dynamics, and what it means for digital processes to consistently work against women and people of color, without our ability to do much about it.”
So, Magoun attempted to undermine an expert in her field based exclusively on the book’s marketing materials and not the book itself. It was an infuriating attack on Noble’s expertise in line with, ironically, the bias Noble herself shines a light on in her research.
But the real twist of irony is that the apology to Noble has been scraped from the web by an organization formed in order to “preserve, research, & promote the history of information & electrical technologies.” Deleting a tweet documenting controversy in the technical community is inarguably a dismissal of the issue as well as a glaring contradiction to the organization’s purpose of preservation.
We have reached out to the IEEE History Center for comment on why it deleted the tweets and will update when we hear back.
Update 4:40pm: The IEEE History Center did not respond to Gizmodo’s request for comment, but the organization tweeted a response to the controversy on Tuesday. It noted that the apology itself was among a series of unauthorized tweets, which was why it was deleted. It added that it “is creating a stronger policy given this circumstance” and extended an apology to Noble.