Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

$500 Million NASA Ares 1 Rocket Launcher Needs One (1) Rocket

Illustration for article titled $500 Million NASA Ares 1 Rocket Launcher Needs One (1) Rocket

If anyone has an Ares 1 rocket they need launching, NASA has a brand new, never-been-used $500 million mobile launching pad that's just itching to hurl something rocket-sized into space.


In case you don't get the humor, dry and subtle as it is, here's a quick primer: Just last month, the Obama Administration—how to put this—tweaked the NASA budget so that manned space travel would no longer be a priority for the agency.


Instead, NASA (which would actually see an increase in funding under the plan), would turn its focus planetside. Robotics, probes, satellites and other autonomous things we haven't thought up yet would be used to explore the vast reaches of the solar system.

Some people were encouraged by the news

"We think it's exciting," NASA Administrator Charles F. Bolden Jr., a former astronaut, said in an e-mailed response to questions. "It will enable us to do things we can only dream about today. It will foster new industries, spur innovation, create jobs and lead to more missions, to more destinations, sooner, safer and faster."

Others were discouraged

"We just pulled the rug out from human space flight," said Jim Bolton, a NASA manager for shuttle processing.


And others still were nonplussed, too busy throwing rocks at representatives houses over healthcare reform to care much either way.

Regardless of the above, the Ares launcher sits, fully functional, at the NASA Kennedy Space Center.


As an aside, it's important to note that Obama's budget has not yet been passed by Congress. He's scheduled to meet with NASA at the Kennedy Space Center on April 15, where he'll no doubt go all-in to explain his budget, its impact, and how a shift to private "space taxis" would allow NASA to focus its efforts (and monies) on long-term programs. [MSNBC/Washington Post]

Share This Story

Get our newsletter



Alright, as a guy that works for NASA thanks for the support Giz. However, I am getting a little tired of the complete mischaratorization of the new budget that you keep repeating. The new budget INCREASED the funding for human spaceflight. What it did do was stop the Orion project that was pretty much doomed to failure, and put the money into coming up with a better plan to get to Mars. Now is 500 million for the launcher a big waste? Yes, but the plan for Orion assumed that we would be deorbiting the ISS NEXT YEAR, in order to use the ISS money to keep Orion going. The ISS was 30 billion dollars. Orion was not necessarily a bad plan but no one ever bothered to give NASA the money to actually do it. So we were just going to give up on doing anything else. You may want to consider reading the Augustine report and the new budget.