The Future Is Here
We may earn a commission from links on this page

Guy Who Claims He Invented Bitcoin Loses $100 Million in Court, Calls It a Win

Those tens of billions of dollars in Bitcoin that Craig Wright claims to have sitting around are sure going to come in handy... right?

We may earn a commission from links on this page.
Image for article titled Guy Who Claims He Invented Bitcoin Loses $100 Million in Court, Calls It a Win
Photo: Mario Tama (Getty Images)

After a week of deliberation, a Miami jury has cleared Craig Wright, an Australian computer scientist who claimed to have helped invent Bitcoin, of most claims in a multi-billion dollar lawsuit. The suit was brought by the estate of Wright’s now-deceased friend over the cryptocurrency’s intellectual property rights. But Wright still has to pay up $100 million in compensatory damages—a titanic sum for most of us, but surely a relative pittance for a man who claims to be a billionaire dozens of times over, right? Right?

Wright claims to have worked on the team that developed Bitcoin and that he is to the one true “Satoshi Nakamoto,” the nom de guerre of the anonymous whitepaper that launched Bitcoin. There is plenty of evidence that these claims aren’t true, and his proclamations are widely disregarded in the cryptocurrency world as a fabrication. But the suit brought by the brother of Dave Kleiman, Wright’s deceased friend, took the assertion as a given and went further by naming Kleiman as a key colleague on the project.


The plaintiffs in the suit claim Wright cheated Kleiman out of the intellectual property rights to Bitcoin, according to Bloomberg. Kleiman’s family then sought a share of some 1.1 million Bitcoins worth around $56 billion (at the going rate of just over $51,000 apiece early Tuesday afternoon) which are thought to be held by Nakamoto as recompense. Those 1.1 million Bitcoins were some of the earliest ever mined and have not been touched since they were created. Wright argued during the trial that while Kleiman did help him out with the Bitcoin project, they only collaborated on mining the cryptocurrency for test purposes and not for profit. He also stated that after Kleiman died in 2013, he had “exaggerated” Kleiman’s contributions to the project to honor a dear, late friend.

Jurors ruled for Wright on most claims in the Kleiman lawsuit—meaning Wright won’t be forced to pony up (or explain why he can’t come up with) those 1.1 million Bitcoins. However, the jury did find Wright liable for conversion, which is effectively theft. They awarded $100 million in compensatory damages to be paid out to W&K Info Defense Research LLC, the firm where Kleiman and Wright supposedly invented the world-altering cryptocurrency. The issue of whether Wright is as rich as he says and thus actually capable of paying that judgment was contentious in court.


As it turns out, control of W&K is itself contested between Dave Kleiman’s brother Ira Kleiman, Wright’s ex-wife Lynn Wright, and Wright’s current wife Ramona Watts, according to Coindesk. The latter two parties claim that Kleiman didn’t have authority to bring this suit in the first place, and it’s possible that Kleiman could end up with nothing (and much of whatever judgement ends up being paid out going to Wright’s ex-wife). The matter is being litigated in Palm Beach County court.

Wright has separately claimed to have lost the private keys to a digital wallet containing around 111,000 Bitcoin in a February 2020 hack on his home computer, and earlier this year he sued developers at four separate cryptocurrency networks in UK court as part of an effort to reclaim his lost bounty. As the Financial Times noted, Wright is not demanding the developers recover the allegedly stolen coins but replace them with fresh ones, which doesn’t seem to mesh with the founding ethos of Bitcoin at all. One of the defendants told Reuters that they don’t believe Wright has proven his ownership of the Bitcoin in question.

The UK also has far stricter libel laws than the U.S., which the Times reported Wright has happily used against people who contest his claims to have invented the cryptocurrency. In yet another lawsuit, Wright sued, saying its hosting of a copy of the original Bitcoin white paper violated his copyright. Wright won that suit in a default judgment in June 2021. Once again, it’s curious that the creator of Bitcoin would do something so openly in conflict with its libertarian ethos.

A lawyer for Wright, Andres Rivero, characterized the jury’s decision as a crushing blow to the plaintiffs.


“The plaintiffs were claiming $600 billion-plus punitives,” Rivero told Bloomberg in a phone interview. “This is one of the most resounding victories ever in American litigation. We had crushed them. Their result is less than any settlement offer we ever made to them. This is a total loss for the other side.”

In a video message, CNN wrote, Wright told supporters, “This has been a remarkably good outcome and I feel completely vindicated. There are still more fights. We are going to make everything change: cryptocurrency to digital cash the way it’s meant to be.”


“We are immensely gratified that our client, W&K Information Defense Research LLC, has won $100,000,000 reflecting that Craig Wright wrongfully took bitcoin-related assets from W&K,” attorneys for W&K told CNBC in a statement.

As the Guardian reported, Wright has promised to prove he is Satoshi Nakamoto if he won the suit by transferring some of the early Bitcoins as well as donating some of the cryptocurrency to charity. Wright’s attorney confirmed to the Guardian that goal remains his intent.


Wright told Bloomberg, however, that he believes the verdict in the Kleiman case has settled the issue of Bitcoin’s creator: “The jury has obviously found that I am [Satoshi Nakamoto] because there would have been no award otherwise. And I am.”

Update: 12/8/2021 at 4:25 p.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional context about the ownership conflict at W&K Info Defense Research LLC.