Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Intel's Ivy Bridge May Not Be Ready in Time for the Next Macbook Pros

Illustration for article titled Intels Ivy Bridge May Not Be Ready in Time for the Next Macbook Pros

It looks like Intel's 22nm 3D "Tri-Gate" Ivy Bridge—successor to the Sandy Bridge chipset—isn't going to be ready until March or April of next year, according to a report from Swedish website Sweclockers. That'll probably be too late to make it into a super-thin Macbook Pro refresh.

Advertisement

Ivy Bridge chips are expected to deliver a massive 37% improvement Intel's current Sandy Bridge chips, owing to the chip's first-of-its-kind 3D chip architecture, allowing it to cut chip size from 32nm down to 22nm. It also cuts power usage in half. Basically it's a monster-in-waiting. It just sucks that it's probably going to remain in waiting long enough to miss out of the next Macbook Pro refresh, which is rumored to be a fat-cutting redesign.

Advertisement

The last major overhaul of the Pro's body was 2008's move to the unibody design. While it's still at the top of the heap on build quality, the overwhelming popularity of the Macbook Air's ethereally-slim design might mean a water-treading guts update to the Pro would probably still do gangbusters sales with the Biggest Loser treatment. The late-2010 Macbook Air was wildly popular despite an outdated (but functional) Core 2 Duo chipset, as was the original unibody Macbook Pro with its own by-then lacking C2D. But still, it sure would sting if you pick up a skinny new MBP, only to have Intel's new miracle processor fall out of the sky a few months later. So an advance caveat emptor to the lot of you. [Sweclockers via 9to5mac]


You can keep up with Kyle Wagner, the author of this post, on Twitter.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Unfortunate if true. The most exciting thing about Ivy Bridge IMO was the graphics, we knew it was getting either 16 or 24 EU's compared to SB's 6-12 (HD2000-HD3000), which alone would make it about 25% faster with 16 compared to 12 EU's not even considering architectural improvements, but there were also those rumors that it would have on-die graphics memory which would make it potentially much faster. For the 13' Pro and the Air's, that would have been quite a boon. With improved architecture and on-die memory it could well be double the performance of the HD3000, putting it in mid-range discreet graphics territory.

Edit: Another thought occurs, with the Mini going ODD-less the Pro's seem sure to follow, without an optical drive they could potentially put a discreet GPU into the 13' as well.