Advertisement
Advertisement

As proof of Mondelez’s alleged malfeasance, Hydrox posted pictures showing their cookies obscured behind other products, moved onto shelves outside customers direct line of sight, and more. Hydrox claims that, in some cases, its shelf space was taken by “another flavor of Oreo or Nutter Butters.”

Hydrox thinks that Mondelez’s use of direct store distribution (where the Oreo maker restocks the product instead of grocery stores themselves) allows its delivery personnel to move competing Hydrox cookies to less desirable locations. In response to Hydrox’s Facebook post, a few users posted comments supporting the allegations, with one person claiming that an employee at their local grocery store said “the Oreo folks threatened to cut back on their deliveries if Hydrox wasn’t dropped.”

Advertisement

When we reached out to Mondelez for comment, a company spokesman told Gizmodo that Mondelez is “confident that this accusation has no merit. The OREO brand is an iconic one, with a proud and rich history of delivering great tasting products and exciting innovations to our consumers for more than a century. This focus, and our commitment to operating with integrity, has made OREO America’s favorite cookie.”

As fans of cookies of all shapes and types, we hope that Hydrox and Oreo can settle their differences and go back to selling sugary treats based on each cookie’s individual merits. And if one brand ends up prevailing, maybe that’s just the way the cookie crumbles.

Advertisement

Have you seen any unsavory cookie practices? Hit me up at sam.rutherford@gizmodo.com.