The Climate Danger of Kamala Harris’ Prison Labor Legacy

Senator Kamala Harris, the running mate for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, speaks during a campaign event in Wilmington, Delaware, on August 12, 2020.
Senator Kamala Harris, the running mate for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, speaks during a campaign event in Wilmington, Delaware, on August 12, 2020.
Photo: Carolyn Kaster (AP)

We finally have a woman of color on a major party ticket. Joe Biden’s selection of Sen. Kamala Harris as his vice president is historic and something to celebrate, but she still deserves scrutiny. This coupling makes some important climate battles especially hard if Biden wins the White House. But Harris’ past treatment of incarcerated people, in particular, also raises troubling climate concerns as well. People call Harris a cop for a reason.


California incarcerates more people than entire nations, and Black, Indigenous, and Latinx people make up the majority of those behind bars. California depends on its huge prison population to help fight wildfires, and Harris’ office was a major proponent of the incarcerated wildland firefighting program during her time as state attorney general.

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) had been struggling to recruit candidates for this program in recent years, and some prison reform policies threatened to further undercut the agency. Assembly Bill 109 passed in 2011. Its sole purpose was to help reduce prison populations of non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders—the exact groups CDCR recruited for firefighting duty. Three years later, voters passed Proposition 47, which reclassified some drug and theft offenses from felonies to misdemeanors. During that time, the courts also ordered the state to expand its early parole program, which involved expanding two-for-one credits, a perk that cuts two days off a person’s sentence for every day served.

Those policies were all designed to reduce the prison population. However, they also undercut the conservation camp program, which offered reduced sentences as a major draw. If incarcerated people can get an early release outside fire camps, then why would they risk their lives putting out wildfires?

Under Harris’ leadership in 2014, her office advocated against policies to do that because of the impact they’d have on available candidates for these conservation camps, the formal name for the program. Her office went so far as to file a court motion in 2014 in opposition to that order regarding early parole. The court motion read:

Extending 2-for-1 credits to all minimum custody inmates at this time would severely impact fire camp participation—a dangerous outcome while California is in the middle of a difficult fire season and severe drought. ...

The extension of 2-for-1 credits to all [minimum security facility] inmates would likely make fire camp beds even more difficult to fill, as low-level, non-violent inmates would choose to participate in the MSF program rather than endure strenuous physical activities and risk injury in fire camps.

This is part of Harris’ legacy, though she told BuzzFeed News she was “shocked” by the motion and only learned about it after reading the news of it. She also told ThinkProgress in the wake of the motion that the “argument played out in court does not reflect my priorities ... The idea that we incarcerate people to have indentured servitude is one of the worst possible perceptions.” Even if it doesn’t reflect her views, it’s still concerning given that she oversaw the office making the argument. She wanted to keep people in jail who deserved their freedom, all to ensure that the state would be able to fight increasingly large and dangerous fires on the cheap (CDCR and the California Department of Forestry pay a pittance of $5.12 a day with a $1 per hour raise for conservation camp members who are actively on the fire line).

“What you go on is really what people have done much more than what they have said,” said Panagioti Tsolkas, the co-founder of Fight Toxic Prisons. “You can’t expect the same people who have been doing the same things to reinforce mass incarceration to all of a sudden change their tone without massive public pressure.”


Wildfires have already become larger and more destructive across the West, and it will only get worse. Even if Biden and Harris win in November and make tremendous strides to bring down greenhouse gas emissions, they need to prepare for a more volatile climate. They’ll need comprehensive plans to prevent, prepare, and put out these worsening wild fires. Harris’s record, at least, shows a disturbing disregard for prisoners’ rights and a willingness to put the most vulnerable among us on the front lines of climate disaster. That matters because if their ticket wins, we could see the dependence on this prison labor on a larger scale.


The executive office isn’t responsible for state prisons and their populations, but it is responsible for the prisons under the federal Bureau of Prisons. There are more than 156,000 people in federal custody who could potentially be impacted.

“If we as a society take it serious that we don’t view prisoners as second-class citizens or as some permanent underclass or caste system, one of the first steps along the way is to get rid of the system of prison slavery, that you can economically exploit someone because they’ve been convicted of a crime,” Tsolkas said.


While Harris has made environmental justice a hallmark of her platform during her presidential run and time in the Senate, she hasn’t factored in the much-needed justice for incarcerated people or formerly incarcerated people. Sure, she’s made calls to end mass incarceration and the death penalty during her own presidential bid, but (like many other politicians) she hasn’t spoke about prisons in the context of the climate crisis. What role might incarcerated people play on this journey to climate justice? Will they be forced to front line to combat fires or left behind as a hurricane approaches? Or will we see true justice that rights past wrongs and brings everyone along into a new green economy? Her track record suggests that she can’t offer them much besides a shovel or work uniform to deal with the dangerous work free people don’t want to do.


“I think she’s got to do some hard thinking about what it means to face a country that’s looking to drastically shift its policies around incarceration and address the fact that this toxic industry of mass incarceration has been really detrimental rather than rehabilitative,” Tsolkas said.

With the Black Lives Matter and prison abolition movements growing more prominent, now is the moment for our leaders to have vision. The climate crisis is here, too, and they need to factor prisons and those locked away into the equation. Putting these vulnerable populations on the frontline of the climate crisis is not the answer, especially when they’re paid scraps and not afforded the same opportunities beyond prison. Climate and abolition advocates have been coming together recently, and they need to continue to push Biden and Harris, particularly on this front.


Update, 8/14/20, 12:08 p.m. EST: Sen. Harris’ office reached out to note that her comments about the 2014 court motion filed while she was California attorney general included her saying she was unaware of the motion and that it didn’t reflect her “priorities.” This post has been updated to include that context.

Correction, 8/21/20, 1:40 pm EST: This post has been corrected to clarify $5.12 is what these firefighters make a day, not per hour. We regret this error.


Yessenia Funes is climate editor at Atmos Magazine. She loves Earther forever.



Yes. Harris chose to build her career by running significant parts of the criminal justice machine. As part of that job she fought to make life more difficult for prisoners and to ensure a ready supply of prison slave labor, as this article pointed out, and also fought to keep people in prison who didn’t belong there. She had a troubling tendency to try to use the blunt force of criminal justice system as a tool to solve social problems.  Also, while she has a pretty admirable record resisting calls to seek the death penalty in high profile murder cases, she also fought to maintain death sentences that had already been handed down.

Hers is a decidedly mixed record (being generous) on criminal justice reform and accountability. Coupled with the fact that Biden is an architect of the 1994 crime bill, there is every reason to be skeptical of this ticket on this issue, and to point out and criticize them on their record and push them towards being better.  And for all the purity politics folks out there, yes, I am going to vote without reservation for Biden/Harris (I may even donate to them depending on circumstances, although I suspect those dollars would be more useful elsewhere), but I am not going to hold my criticism where I consider them to fall short on a critical issue.