Skip to content
io9

Why Science Fiction Readers Shouldn’t Just Cling to the Golden Age

By

Reading time 1 minute

Comments (0)

Author Gareth Powell recently attended a book group where nobody had read any authors who came along in the past 50 years. Ina bracing essay for SF Signal, he talks about the peril of focusing only on “golden age” science fiction, and neglecting how the genre has changed.

Powell writes:

Some fans will always cling to the ‘golden age’ works of the 1950s,
1960s and 1970s, and I can understand why. They provide a magic door
back to the simple pleasures of a simpler world – a world before global
warming, oil shortages, terrorism, and economic uncertainty; relics of a
world where the future was easily understood, and (largely) American,
middle class and white in outlook, origin and ethnicity.

Part of me understands and sympathizes with that need for security. I
still draw comfort and enjoyment from those old books. Arthur C.
Clarke, Larry Niven, Philip K. Dick… These writers are the elder gods in
my personal pantheon; but they are neither the beginning nor the end.
Society and culture have moved on, and there’s more to our genre than
words written more than half a century ago….

Science fiction isn’t a museum exhibit. It isn’t a collection of musty
old paperbacks on a dealer’s table, or a cardboard box of old videos in
your attic. It’s a vital and evolving genre, filled with verve and
possibility. To let it stagnate would be to let it die.

The whole essay is well worth reading.

Explore more on these topics

Share this story

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and interact with our community, get up to date with our customised Newsletters and much more.