ISS Ditches 2.9-Ton Pallet of Batteries, Creating Its Most Massive Piece of Space Trash

The external pallet packed with old nickel-hydrogen batteries, photographed shortly after being released by the Canadarm2 robotic arm. The object was orbiting 265 miles (427 km) above Chile when this photo was taken from the ISS.
The external pallet packed with old nickel-hydrogen batteries, photographed shortly after being released by the Canadarm2 robotic arm. The object was orbiting 265 miles (427 km) above Chile when this photo was taken from the ISS.
Image: NASA

Weighing 2.9 tons and traveling 4.8 miles per second, this heap of old batteries is now the heaviest single piece of garbage to be jettisoned from the International Space Station.

Advertisement

The pallet is packed with nickel-hydrogen batteries, and it will stay in low Earth orbit for the next two to four years “before burning up harmlessly in the atmosphere,” according to a NASA statement. SpaceFlightNow reports that the pallet is the “most massive object ever jettisoned from the orbiting outpost.”

NASA spokesperson Leah Cheshier confirmed this as being the case.

“The External Pallet was the largest object—mass-wise—ever jettisoned from the International Space Station at 2.9 tons, more than twice the mass of the Early Ammonia Servicing System tank jettisoned by spacewalker Clay Anderson during the STS-118 mission in 2007,” wrote Cheshier in an email.

NASA’s ballistics officers “indicate no threat” of the pallet smashing into other space objects, but “this item, like all, will be tracked by U.S. Space Command,” she added.

It wasn’t the original plan for the pallet to be discarded like this. The failed launch of a Soyuz rocket in 2018, in which NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Roscosmos cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin were forced to make an emergency landing in the Kazakh steppe, caused a disruption to the spacewalking schedule, leading to the leftover pallet.

The Canadarm2 robotic arm shortly before releasing the pallet.
The Canadarm2 robotic arm shortly before releasing the pallet.
Image: NASA
Advertisement

NASA’s spacewalk on February 1, 2021, involving astronauts Mike Hopkins and Victor Glover, was notable in that it concluded a four-year effort to upgrade the space station’s batteries. These batteries store energy collected by solar arrays, but in 2011 NASA decided to make the switch from nickel-hydrogen batteries to lithium-ion batteries. Production of these batteries started in 2014, and the process of swapping them out began in 2016.

This effort required four supply missions from the Japanese H-II Transfer Vehicle (HTV) cargo spacecraft, 13 different astronauts, and 14 spacewalks, in which 48 nickel-hydrogen batteries were replaced by 24 lithium-ion batteries.

Advertisement

Normally, the old batteries would be placed inside an HTV and jettisoned from the ISS, and the items would mostly burn up on re-entry. But the Soyuz launch failure disrupted the pattern of spacewalks and the intended schedule such that, in late 2018, an HTV cargo freighter left the station without a battery pallet, according to SpaceFlightNow. The battery-replacement mission continued, and HTVs continued to depart the station with pallets, but now with an extra one perpetually attached to the station. With the mission done and no more HTVs coming (at least none of the old design—they’re being replaced by the HTV-X cargo spacecraft), mission planners had to jettison the pallet on its own.

So that’s what they did on Thursday March 11, when mission controllers in Houston used the Canadarm2 robotic arm to “release an external pallet loaded with old nickel-hydrogen batteries into Earth orbit,” according to NASA. The object was released approximately 265 miles (427 km) above Earth’s surface.

Advertisement

“It used to be that it wasn’t a big deal to toss stuff from ISS because very few satellites were below it [at altitudes below 250 miles (400 km)], ” Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, explained in an email. “That’s not so true any more with a bunch of cubesats and with recently launched Starlinks during orbit raising. So I have concerns.”

To which he added: “I don’t immediately see what else they could have done except fly a whole extra HTV mission just to get rid of it.”

Advertisement

According to the European Space Agency, around 34,000 objects larger than 3.9 inches (10 cm) are currently in orbit around Earth, in addition to millions of tinier objects, such as tools and bits of spacecraft. The volume of objects in space, both functional and non-functional, is steadily increasing, prompting concerns of potential collisions and even more orbital debris.

This post was updated to include comments made by Jonathan McDowell.

Advertisement

George is a senior staff reporter at Gizmodo.

DISCUSSION

swanyswanson
SwanySwanson

What’s the point of leaving it up there for another 2-4 years? The range alone seems ridiculous, like they lacked the ability to crunch the number to give the exact time it would burn up? Knowing we landed remotely on Mars tells me the number crunching isn’t the issue. So. Why, tf, do people get paid to watch this thing for 4 years? It’s trash right?

I guess I am asking, what’s stopping the powers that be from putting it on path to burn up.....   later this month?