Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

The Original Black Hole For Interstellar Was Too Confusing

Illustration for article titled The Original Black Hole For iInterstellar /iWas Too Confusing

One of the many reasons why Interstellarwas such a wonderful movie was that it used genuine scientific equations to show what happens in the vicinity of a black hole. But, just like the actors in front of the camera, it seems the black hole also got a little make up to make it more presentable for the big screen.

Advertisement

A new paper, published in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity by the movie's visual effects team and its scientific consultant, explains that the original black hole—pictured above— produced by the team's equations was judged to be a little too confusing for movie-goers. So, eventually, the science was toned down a little.

Advertisement

Kip Thorne from the California Institute of Technology was the scientist who worked with London-based visual effects studio Double Negative on the film's black hole. Together, they used Albert Einstein's equations of general relativity to create a simulation—with some tweaks.

Perhaps most understandably, the team modelled the black hole using bundles of light rays rather than individual ones. That, they explain to New Scientist, avoided flickering discontinues, by smoothing out the general appearance of the black hole—and presumably making the cinema-going experience rather less nauseating, too.

Elsewhere, the accretion disc—the ring of matter that encircles the hole—was found to warp the shape of the black hole. Turns out that was because the black hole was supposed to be spinning rapidly in the film. The asymmetry made the whole thing look rather confusing, so the team slowed the black hole's rate of rotation down, making the whole thing look more symmetric and pleasing for cinema goers.

Finally, one quirk was largely a result of taste. Many elements of the simulation were added iteratively, to make the black hole more and more realistic. When it came to including the Doppler effect—correcting the light you see to include frequency shifts induced by the black hole—the whole thing became darker and more blue-tinged. The creative team working on the film favored the earlier versions, which didn't include the Doppler corrections—so the black hole is more red-tinged than it would be in real life.

Advertisement

The final black hole created for the film, shown below, is clearly rather different to the one at the top of the page that was deemed too confusing. So, sure, a pure science movie would have looked different. But this was Hollywood, and aesthetic is important. The results may not have quite been 100 percent accurate—but they sure looked wonderful. [Classical and Quantum Gravity via New Scientist]

Images by Double Negative

Illustration for article titled The Original Black Hole For iInterstellar /iWas Too Confusing
Advertisement

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

THIS! This is the kind of "creativity" with the science that I can forgive and get behind. They knew the science, they worked with the science, and then they tweaked it only as much as necessary in order to make something they felt was more coherent for the story.

This is the kind of change that can keep the science FEELING right, even if there are some minor inaccuracies. It's that whole understanding the rules so you know what you can get away with breaking thing.

Unlike, say, Gravity... where they say "hey, wouldn't it be cool if someone could just float from shuttle to space station to another space station, etc., in, like, a few minutes?" "Orbital physics doesn't work like that." "So? It's a MOVIE. Besides, we're making people float inside the space station, what more accuracy do you want?!?"